Crypto: Not So Uncorrelated After All, Says Morningstar

Bitcoin and other virtual currencies hew more closely to stocks in downdrafts, a study finds.

Bitcoin and its ilk are sometimes known as “digital gold” because, to their many admirers, they promise both riches and lack of correlation to stocks.  Turns out, though, that the cyber currencies sync up more closely during down equity markets and their aftermaths.

That’s the conclusion from a study by Amy Arnott, portfolio strategist with research firm Morningstar.

Crypto typically has a low correlation to stocks and other traditional asset classes, Arnott writes. Trouble is, when stocks go south, crypto tends to go along with them. In 2020, the correlations between the top two cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin and Ethereum—and Morningstar’s equity index reached as high as 0.75.

Perfect correlation is 1.0. The Morningstar paper notes that, back then, “major cryptocurrencies lived up to the maxim that all correlations go to 1.0 in a bear market.” 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Consider the market crash from February 19, 2020, through March 23, 2020, when Bitcoin dropped by 38%. During that time, the S&P 500 fell 34%. And this year’s rocky investing environment shows similar results. The S&P 500 is off 6.4% and Bitcoin is down 11%. Meanwhile, gold is up 8.6% in 2022.

Here’s an irony: Despite its much-touted resemblance to gold, a classic refuge asset, Bitcoin’s performance has been far different from the yellow metal’s. Over a three-year period, Morningstar says, the Bitcoin-gold correlation was just 0.08.

Morningstar also points out that crypto’s wild volatility is sometimes tough to stomach. “While cryptocurrency has an unusually low correlation with traditional asset classes, its volatility makes it tough to use in a diversified portfolio,” the report says. 

Crypto’s trouble zigging while other assets zagged is a recent and rising concern among investors. Earlier this year, an International Monetary Fund report warned of an increasing interconnection between crypto and other assets, especially in emerging market nations.

Related Stories:

Some Institutions Call Crypto Rat Poison, but Others Are Buying the Currency

Gold and Bitcoin, Seen as Opposites, Will Become Co-Equals, Says Market Savant

Rising Crypto-Equity Correlation Raises Bitcoin Stability Concerns

Tags: , , , , , ,

CalPERS to Increase External Management Budget by $145.6 Million

Most of the new fees will be allocated to private equity and real estate.



The California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Finance & Administration Committee voted to increase the fund’s total operating budget by $176 million for fiscal year 2023. This 9.3% increase in expenses comes after the pension fund projected a surplus of $39 million for fiscal year 2022.

“There was a large increase year-over-year budgetary-wise that’s almost exclusively oriented to what the way we forecast our investment fees as opposed to anything operational,” said Michael Cohen, chief financial officer of CalPERS, at their finance committee meeting on Monday.

The projected new investment fees of $145.6 million account for 83% of the total budget increase. Within that, private equity saw the biggest increase in fees.

“In dollar terms, the largest increases are resulting from the private assets,” said Matt Flynn, leader of CalPERS’ investment services division, at the board meeting. “If you recall, part of the strategic asset allocation that this board adopted has meaningful increases to allocation to private debt as a new allocation to private equity and to real assets.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

CalPERS increased its allotment to private equity in December to 13% from 8%. It also created a new strategic asset class for private debt that is allotted 5% of the portfolio. Flynn said at the meeting that CalPERS currently does not have the capacity to internally manage the allocation to private equity, which is why the additional fees will be necessary.

“That’s an organizational construct that we don’t have the ability to scale on an internal basis,” said Flynn.

Related Stories:

Why Bother With Active Management When Mechanistic Passive Does Best Historically?

CalPERS Selects Wilshire Advisors as Consultant for Private Debt Allocation

High Inflation Leads to Expensive Cost-of-Living Adjustments for CalPERS and Others

Tags: , , , , , ,

«