Michigan Pension Tax Likely to Be Removed

Currently, there are only 12 states that do not tax retirement income. Michigan might become the 13th.



Eleven years ago, the state of Michigan introduced a program that forced retirees to pay taxes on their retirement income. The new revenue helped pay for approximately $1 billion in tax cuts to businesses.

Now, some politicians are calling to end it.

“Michiganders who have worked hard, played by the rules, and budgeted for their whole lives should be able to retire and keep all of their hard-earned dollars,” Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, said in a press release last week. “Putting money back in the pockets of retirees will help them afford the essentials from prescriptions, rent, utilities, and car payments, to gifts for their grandkids.”

Prior to the tax law that was implemented in 2011, Michigan was one of 14 states that did not tax retirement income. Today, there are only 12 states that maintain that policy. The 2011 changes have only affected younger retirees born after 1946.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Whitmer’s plan would exempt not only public pensions, but also private pensions, withdraws from individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and the portion of 401(k) accounts that is subject to employer matching contributions, according to the press release.

The idea now has bipartisan support. Republican State Senator Tom Barret introduced a bill on Jan. 13 to repeal the retirement tax, and it looks likely to pass.

“Those tax laws changed after they had retired and it was a detriment to them,” Barrett said of people who had planned their retirement based upon the tax laws that were in effect before 2011.

“It’s hard to go back and replan your retirement after you’ve left your employment and to have that tax liability fall on them,” he told nonprofit news organization Bridge Michigan. “When the rules changed halfway through the game, I felt it was unfair.”

Related Stories:

Michigan Pension Fund Sues Credit Suisse Over Risk Exposure

Sanders, Van Hollen Introduce Bill to Cut Executive Tax Break to Shore Up Pensions

Treasury Approves Benefits Reduction for Michigan Pension

Tags: , , , , ,

CalSTRS Increases Co-Investments and Private Equity Allotments

Co-investments are an increasingly attractive way for investors to avoid private equity fees.



At last Thursday’s board meeting, the $327.7 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) decided to increase its percentage of assets allocated to co-investments, taking part in the growing co-investments trend that has been a source of success for both the pension fund and other institutional investors.

The new policy would allow co-investments to take up 2% of the Private Equity Program’s net asset value, which would be approximately $880 million. This is a 250% increase from the previous allotment to co-investments of $250 million.

“In the early 2000s, co-investing was limited to a small group of forward-thinking LPs [limited partners]. Today, many LPS have entered the market seeking the performance and cost benefits of no-fee, no-carry co-investments,” said Rob Ross, a private equity portfolio manager at CalSTRS, at the meeting.

Co-investments are a type of direct private equity investment by a limited partner (such as CalSTRS) into a company or business. These investments are usually made in addition to previous investments that were facilitated through a private equity fund. However, because the co-investment is a direct investment, the LP does not have to pay additional management fees on it.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The lack of fees, combined with the opportunity to invest in the well-performing private equity sector, has made co-investments boom over the past few years. Private equity funds benefit from these partnerships as well since they bring an increase in capital flow.

John Haggerty of Meketa, a consultant to CalSTRS, explained at the board meeting how the co-investment space has evolved over time.

“Private equity firms used to pair up with other private equity firms to get these large deals done,” said Haggerty. “Now that the expertise exists in the LP community to do these co-investments, it’s much more preferable to do it not with a competitor but rather with a customer.”

Haggerty also believes that CalSTRS’s large size makes it well positioned to make a profit off the co-investing space. There are not many investors capable of making deals of the size that CalSTRS can, meaning that the pension would have less competition.

“There are more larger deals that are available,” Haggerty said at the latest board meeting. “The larger deals represent a unique opportunity to exploit some inefficiencies as there are fewer players in that arena.”

Margot Wirth, director of private equity at CalSTRS, also emphasized that while these new investments will be larger, the private equity portfolio would still maintain a diversified strategy.

“These will allow us to do bigger investments, but we would do bigger investments sparingly and with an abundance of diligence and forethought,” she said at the board meeting.

The pension fund took the first steps to increase its co-investment program back in 2018, with the implementation of CalSTRS’s Collaborative Model. Wirth said the current steps to increase co-investments are essentially just an extension of the model implemented three years ago.

“The revisions we’re recommending are just more steps along that plan,” she said.

At the board meeting, CalSTRS also increased its overall private equity allocation to 13% from 11% and reduced global equity allocation to 45% from 47%.

Related Stories:

Twitter Is Buzzing About This CalSTRS Stock Move

CalSTRS Expected to Hit Full Funding Five Years Ahead of Schedule

CalSTRS CIO Set to Receive $1.1 Million Bonus

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«