SEC Adopts New Contested Election Rules | Chief Investment Officer

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has voted to adopt rules requiring contested elections to use universal proxy cards that include all director nominees presented for election at a shareholder meeting. The changes will allow shareholders voting by proxy to vote just as if they were voting in person.

Unlike shareholders voting in person, shareholders voting by proxy in contested director elections are currently unable to vote for a combination of director nominees from competing slates. The SEC’s adopted final rules require voters to use universal proxy cards by management and shareholders soliciting proxy votes for their candidates in director election contests, essentially allowing them to mix and match their choices. The regulator also amended the current proxy rules so each side can list the other side’s director candidates on its universal proxy card. The new rules also establish new notice and filing requirements for all soliciting parties, as well as formatting and presentation requirements for universal proxy cards.

Additionally, the final rules require shareholders presenting their own director candidates in the contest to solicit holders of a minimum of 67% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote in the election. Registered investment companies and business development companies are not subject to the universal proxy rules.

The universal proxy amendments will apply to all shareholder meetings involving contested director elections held after Aug. 31, 2022, and the rule amendments regarding voting options will be applicable to all shareholder meetings involving director elections held after the same date.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

“These amendments address concerns that shareholders voting by proxy cannot vote for a mix of dissident and registrant nominees in an election contest, as they could if voted in person,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement. The “amendments will put these candidates on the same ballot. They will put investors voting in person and by proxy on equal footing. This is an important aspect of shareholder democracy.”

To help facilitate shareholder voting in director elections, the SEC also voted to adopt amendments to the proxy rules to ensure that proxy cards clearly specify the applicable shareholder voting options in all director elections, and to require proxy statements to disclose the effect of a shareholder’s choice to withhold their vote.

In a dissenting vote, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce said that while she supports universal proxy voting, the SEC’s final rule may advance special interests rather than enhancing corporate value “by serving as a tool for frivolous, as well as serious, activists.” She said she “might have been able to support the rule if I felt we had explored thoroughly the potential that the rule could afford activists without a demonstrated commitment to the company an opportunity to meddle in the company’s affairs. I do not believe we have done this work so I cannot support the rule.”

Editor’s note: CIO is owned by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a proxy advisory firm.

Tags: contested election, Gary Gensler, Hester Peirce, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Shareholder Meetings, universal proxy

Africa’s largest pension, the South Africa-based Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), allowed its contract with the country’s Public Investment Corporation (PIC) to lapse, effectively pulling $4.4 billion out of the continent’s largest asset manager.

For the $110 billion pension, this equates to approximately 4% of its total assets under management (AUM). The contract was five years long and expired this past March.

The decision comes after a 2020 judicial inquiry by the South African government, which found “widespread disregard of PIC policies and processes on the transactions by PIC management and certain board members.” The inquiry focused on corruption in PIC’s Isibaya Fund, which invests in environmentally sustainable and socially responsible projects. The fund is known as a strong resource for Black-owned small and medium-sized businesses. PIC has been involved in impact investing for decades and was ranked among the top 30 responsible global investors just this past week by the Responsible Asset Allocator Initiative (RAAI).

In May, staff at Isibaya submitted a nine-page letter to PIC’s investment committee calling on the organization to take accountability for the corruption issues and failure to renew the contract with GEPF. They blamed executives and stated that fund was in the midst of an “existential crisis.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

The scandals have forced PIC to appoint an entirely new set of board members this month. GEPF is currently negotiating a new contract with PIC but, until the details are finalized, PIC has been forced to curtail some of its investments. GEPF Head of Investments Sifiso Sibiya told Bloomberg News last week that the new contract is expected to reduce the amount of funding to PIC, but by exactly how much is still uncertain.