Boston University Joins Harvard in Divesting From Fossil Fuels

The $3 billion endowment, which eliminated coal and tar sand investments in 2016, will phase out crude oil and natural gas immediately.


Boston University (BU) has joined its neighbor Harvard University in announcing that it will divest from fossil fuels. The university said its $3 billion endowment will immediately phase out its investments in crude oil and natural gas, having already divested from tar sands and coal companies in 2016.

“This has been a long journey within the BU community and the Board of Trustees,” University President Robert A. Brown said, according to the university’s communications office. “This is putting us on the right side of history.”

The board of trustees’ Advisory Committee on Socially Responsible Investing (ACSRI) recommended the divestment policies and goals to the board, which then approved them. The committee made the recommendation after meeting with university experts and advocates, concluding that the degree of harm caused by fossil fuel-related emissions justified divesting from the sector. 

“Climate change is moving much more rapidly than we thought even five years ago,” said Richard Reidy, head of the ACSRI. “We all heavily rely on fossil fuels, but there has to be a transition process. We think that divestment is one vehicle to hasten fossil fuel extractors to transition to renewable energy.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The divestment plan also allows for embracing clean energy technologies, which Reidy said will become increasingly abundant and profitable over time.

“These are specific, achievable recommendations,” said Lila Hunnewell, BU’s chief investment officer, who will oversee the transition from fossil fuel investments. “It’s both a divestment plan and investment plan that reflects the aspirations of the community and the limitations created by the endowment’s current scale.”

The decision by Boston University followed Harvard’s announcement earlier this month that it would allow its remaining investments in the fossil fuel industry to expire in order to eventually divest from the sector.

Although Harvard President Lawrence S. Bacow didn’t use the word divest, he wrote in a message to the Harvard community that “legacy investments” through third-party firms “are in runoff mode,” and said that “given the need to decarbonize the economy and our responsibility as fiduciaries to make long-term investment decisions that support our teaching and research mission, we do not believe such investments are prudent.”

The move brought to an end years of divestment demands by students and faculty that had been met with consistent refusal by the Harvard Management Company (HMC). Prior to the divestment decision, the firm, which manages the $42 billion endowment, had stuck by a policy position that “the university maintains a strong presumption against divesting investment assets for reasons unrelated to the endowment’s financial strength and its capacity to further Harvard’s academic goals.”

Fossil Fuel Divest Harvard, which has been calling on the university to divest from the fossil fuel industry since the organization was founded in 2012, said it was a momentous victory.

“After nearly a decade of organizing by students, faculty, alumni, and community members, we have succeeded in pushing one of the world’s richest and most powerful universities to divest from the fossil fuel industry,” the organization said in a statement. “For too long, Harvard has stood on the wrong side of history, lending legitimacy to the companies driving global warming and environmental injustice by investing part of its $42 billion endowment in them.”

Related Stories:

Harvard Faculty Divestment Vote Unlikely to Sway Endowment

Al Gore Calls on Harvard to Divest from Fossil Fuels

Boston University Endowment Hires from Cambridge Associates

Tags: , , , , , ,

Lawmakers Propose Portable Retirement Accounts Bill

The PRIA Act is intended to help Americans avoid losing retirement funds when changing jobs.


Rep. Jim Himes, D-Connecticut, and US Sen. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, have reintroduced legislation intended to create universal, portable retirement and investment accounts for all Americans.

Under the Portable Retirement and Investment Account Act of 2021, or the PRIA Act, every American would receive a “PRIA” at the same time they receive a Social Security number. PRIAs would be administered by an independent board and managed by selected financial institutions. After the creation of the initial account, accountholders would have the option to choose investment options from a qualified financial institution.

Employers could contribute to their employees’ PRIAs just like 401(k)s, but employees who separate from their employer would still have the ability to contribute to the same PRIA plan as before. PRIAs are intended to supplement the existing retirement system and provide a portable option, so people would still be able to keep their 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and other savings plans if they choose.

“PRIA is going to bring people in from the cold,” Himes said in a statement. “Instead of seeing themselves fall further and further behind in their retirement savings, millions of Americans in nontraditional employment arrangements will have another tool in their retirement toolbox.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The act would also establish a Portable Retirement and Investment Board to be headed by a presidentially appointed director. The board would consist of three members appointed by the secretary of the Treasury, three named by the secretary of Labor, two by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), and one appointed by the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Hines originally introduced the PRIA Act in October 2018, but the bill never made it past the House Ways and Means Committee.

Research from investment manager Vanguard shows that when 401(k) participants change jobs, those with smaller balances often do not roll over retirement savings into their new plans or tax-advantaged vehicles. Additionally, when a participant leaves a job with less than $5,000 in a 401(k), employers can transfer small balance accounts out of the plan and into a safe harbor IRA, where fees can be higher. Vanguard said this can result in a proliferation of stranded safe harbor IRAs, participant cash-outs, and forfeiture of future savings and returns.

“The current retirement system isn’t working for all Americans,” Himes said. “The options to which American workers have access can differ significantly based on their area of employment, and the systems can be needlessly confusing. In addition, many Americans lose access to retirement savings vehicles if they lose their jobs, and gig, contract, and part-time workers are often ineligible. PRIA changes all of this.”

Related Stories:

Senators Reintroduce Bills to Bolster Retirement Savings

Retirement Support Could Be Included in $2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill

Senate Bill Targets Women’s Retirement Savings Inequities

Tags: , , , , , ,

«