What Price Yield? Fund Managers ‘Taking Excessive Risk’

Fixed-income funds may be taking on more risks than investors realize due to the huge demand for income.

Fund managers’ search for yield in fixed income is pushing them to take on additional liquidity, credit, and currency risks, according to Fitch Ratings.

A research note from the ratings agency has outlined dangers to bond fund clients posed by low yields and managers’ search for higher-paying securities.

“Managers are reluctantly looking for opportunities in lower rated, less liquid, off-benchmark bonds… despite a growing consensus that the risks are beginning to outweigh the rewards.” 

European fixed-income products—in particular high yield funds—“have benefited the most from additional central bank liquidity and improved sentiment” in the first few months of 2015, wrote Fitch analysts Manuel Arrivé and Richard Woodrow.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

But managers may be tempted to overreach, they added, “potentially loosening selectivity in credit and leading to excessive risk taking.”

“As the search for yield continues unabated, portfolio managers are reluctantly looking for opportunities in lower rated, less liquid, off-benchmark bonds, adding higher credit and liquidity risk (potentially higher currency risk), often extending duration, despite a growing consensus that the risks are beginning to outweigh the rewards,” Arrivé and Woodrow wrote.

Fitch also echoed a warning sounded by some fixed-income investors that large retail funds in the asset class “could face a liquidity trap” if trying to close positions at times of market stress.

“Effective embedding of liquidity risk management in portfolio construction and a diversified, sticky investor base would mitigate potential mismatches between assets and liabilities in the event of a sell-off,” according to Arrivé and Woodrow.

So far, bond market dynamics have not led Fitch Ratings to downgrade any funds, but the agency warned that if its concerns came to pass then downgrades could follow

Related Content: Bonds Drive Double-Digit Returns for UK Investors & Why a $100B Fund is Too Big to Fail

Strife Erupts at U of Louisville Endowment

Compensation and transparency issues pushed two trustees to call for the university to take over management of the $1.1 billion fund.

Trustees of the $1.1 billion University of Louisville Foundation have gone public with an internal conflict over executive staff compensation and governance practices.

Board member Steve Wilson, a Kentucky hotel and farm owner, submitted a letter on April 29 to the state Auditor of Public Accounts requesting an official audit of the university and foundation—an independently run nonprofit that manages the school’s endowment.   

“I have for some time been troubled by the lack of information that the board of trustees receives from the administration and chairman of the board,” Wilson wrote, according to a copy obtained by CIO. “Various events—too numerous to list—have led me to be concerned about fulfilling my fiduciary and statutory responsibilities as a board member.”

Wilson stated that he and his fellow trustees had not been informed of compensation deals made by the independently operated foundation with members of the university administration. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“We are having internal discussions and are looking at the matter, but we’ve launched no examination,” a spokesperson for the auditor told CIO.

Late last year, tax filings for 2012 revealed that the nonprofit had awarded University President James Ramsey $2.4 million in deferred compensation, along with $1.8 million for the school’s outgoing provost and $1.3 million to Ramsey’s chief of staff. These payments dwarfed the administrators’ reported salaries by up to 4,000%. Provost Shirley Willinhnganz, for example, earned $45,646 in base wages from the foundation in 2012—a package that climbed to $1,925,108 when the deferred compensation was accounted for.

Following these revelations, Wilson and fellow trustee Craig Greenberg have called for the foundation to be folded into the university, the Louisville Courier-Journal reported yesterday.  

Board Chairman Robert Hughes decried Wilson and Greenberg’s actions to the newspaper, arguing that the two should have “made their case to the entire board instead of bypassing their fellow trustees, the chairman of the board, and the administration of the university.”

Wilson and the foundation’s lawyer did not respond to requests for comment. A university spokesperson declined to remark on the situation. 

Related Content: 2014 NACUBO-Commonfund Report on US Endowments

U of L Letter to Auditor

«