Follow-Up: Doomster Grantham’s Stock Picks Are Doing Pretty Well

This noted market pessimist said in January that some shares would thrive, despite a popped bubble.


The famous bear Jeremy Grantham predicted six weeks ago that the stock market was in a bubble that soon would pop. No surprise there, although he has correctly pinpointed previous stock manias that came to grief.

But Grantham, the co-founder of investment firm GMO, provided some picks that he said would do well in the future, regardless of any overall market pratfall. (Which hasn’t occurred yet.) Value stocks are poised to rise, he said. So are emerging market (EM) and electric vehicle (EV) shares.

While he didn’t single out any particular names as winners—and he thinks Tesla is incredibly overvalued—Grantham’s themes have done well since late January. Sure, Grantham is the sort of investor who doesn’t look for short-term jumps. But still, the performance of many of these stocks may signal there is a promising tomorrow for them.

Value Stocks. These have turned in nice performances as part of the big market rotation away from the hot tech players of 2020. Such a trend mirrors what happened after previous debacles, like the 2008 financial crisis, when value had its day. This time, the pattern isn’t as neat: Growth stocks continued to romp after the plummet 12 months ago. The current movement is a delayed reaction.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The Russell 1000 value index is up 13.5% this year, while its growth counterpart is only a fraction above zero. This is most apparent in the long-suffering financial services and energy sectors.

Consider two of the nation’s largest banks, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, whose share prices are buoyed by higher interest rates. That means they stand to earn more from loans, because they can attract deposits at ultra-low, Federal Reserve-orchestrated short-term rates, then lend the money out for longer periods at higher rates, creaming off the difference. JPM is up 23% in 2021 and BofA is ahead 25%.

By the same token, oil giants ExxonMobil and Chevron are enjoying share boosts of 46% and 37%, respectively. Their savior: Oil prices have swelled to $65 a barrel, up from a negative number at one point last year. That’s due to the prudence of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its production restrictions. Big Oil has indicated that, unlike in past escalations of crude prices, it will hold down its capital spending, in a bid not to be caught by future downdrafts.

Emerging Markets. Many of the EM economies suffered in the pandemic last year. Now, they are showing signs of life. Much of that stems from a re-opening of trade and economic activity thanks to the vaccines. Let’s look at them, without the influence of China, which despite its status as the world’s No. 2 economy, still is classified as an EM.

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF is up this year by 5.2%, just slightly behind the S&P 500’s 5.7%. And India’s Sensex index, for instance, has advanced 6.4%, in spite of numerous lingering difficulties. The market thinking apparently is that, among other things, India is a good place to invest, rather than autocratic China. Ever-stable Singapore, up 9.2%, also is benefiting. Exceptions exist, of course: The pandemic continues to hurt Brazil inordinately. The Bovespa is down 3.5% this year.

The optimistic EM thesis is that these nations are where tomorrow’s big growth will occur. Helping for the moment is a surge in commodity prices, and raw materials are the EMs’ specialty. Copper, for instance, is up 17% this year.

Electric Vehicles. Although they won’t retire the internal combustion engine soon, these battery-powered conveyances have a lot of promise. Their stocks may increase up to 50% this year, by the estimation of Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who believes ample room exists in this market outside of Tesla. Reason: “We’re seeing a green tidal wave globally,” he told CNBC this month.

The rotation away from tech stocks, which EV companies kinda are, has pulled down many of their share prices. But they have a lot going for them. California is requiring that 75% of heavy-duty trucks sold there be electric by 2035. New Jersey and other states are eyeing similar mandates.

Tesla shares, along with those of Chinese rivals Nio and Li Auto, have deflated recently, only to stage a comeback. Tesla, after losing a jolting $277 billion in one month, has almost returned to where it was at the year’s start. As a result, even though Tesla has only just managed to turn a profit in the past year, betting against it hasn’t turned out to be wise.

Grantham is vocal in his doubts about Tesla, which he marvels has achieved a 25% sales growth in the past year and yet a 700% stock growth. He said earlier this month, in a back-handed compliment, “They’ve constantly done the impossible.”

Related Stories:

Jeremy Grantham Thinks the Bubble Will Burst … But He Has Some Stock Picks

Vaccines and Pent-Up Demand Will Jazz Stocks, Says Paul Tudor Jones

Emerging Markets and China Hedge Funds Likely to Outperform

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Controversy Still Follows CalPERS’ CIO Resignation

More than a half-year after Ben Meng resigned, a lawsuit and pending pension system policy decisions are bringing his departure back into the limelight.


Seven months after California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Chief Investment Officer Ben Meng resigned following conflict-of-interest charges, the fallout continues over his abrupt departure.

At the same time, the largest pension organization in the United States, with $440 billion in assets, still does not have a new CIO, despite a search that has gone on for least six months.

Now, a former CalPERS board member and investment officer has filed a lawsuit demanding that the pension system turn over transcripts, recordings, and notes from a closed-door board meeting held on August 17 allegedly to discuss the Meng affair. Meng resigned on August 5.

J.J. Jelincic’s lawsuit, filed on March 8 in Alameda County Superior Court in Northern California, said the board discussed Meng’s resignation at the meeting and violated the state’s open meetings law.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, the CalPERS board’s Governance Committee is scheduled to discuss and possibly approve a plan that would require the full 13-member pension system board to be notified when a top system official is under internal investigation because of possible wrongdoing.

Back in August, several angry CalPERS board members said they only learned about Meng’s ethics issues from the media after his resignation. 

The Governance Committee is also scheduled to discuss another issue related to the search for the new CIO. The CalPERS board approved a new policy in the fall making the hiring and dismissal of a CIO, including performance evaluations, a shared responsibility between the board and CEO Marcie Frost.

Previously, it was up only to Frost to hire the CIO. But it’s still a subject of debate just who on the board will participate in choosing the CIO.

Board member Margaret Brown told CIO that briefings on potential candidates are currently limited to six of the 13 board members, on two search committees.

“We are in the dark,” she said of herself and the six other board members who aren’t participating in the search.

The subcommittees are scheduled to meet in closed session on Wednesday. They also met on March 2 and continue to interview candidates for the position.

Meng had only been the CalPERS CIO since January 2019. He resigned one day after an anonymous ethics complaint was filed against him with the California Fair Political Practices Commission. The commission is conducting a formal investigation into the matter.

The ethics complaint said Meng had approved a $1 billion CalPERS limited partner investment in a Blackstone private equity fund while holding up to $100,000 worth of stock in publicly traded Blackstone. State ethics rules would have required Meng to recuse himself from the investment decision.

Meng said he resigned because of health issues in a statement released by CalPERS back in August.

Jelincic’s lawsuit alleges that the CalPERS board discussed Meng in its closed-door meeting in August, violating state rules that California meetings must be open except when discussing employee performance and lawsuit strategy.

Jelincic told CIO that the closed-door board discussions went beyond what is allowed to be heard without the meeting being open to the public.

“The meeting didn’t deal with personnel issues. Ben was already gone,” Jelincic said. “They certainly didn’t have a discussion with what to do with Ben.”

The lawsuit says topics covered at the closed meeting included the hiring and training of CalPERS officials and new policies the board could use to govern investigations into CalPERS staffers. Jelincic said he was told what happened at the meeting by a board member, whom he did not identify.

CalPERS spokesman Wayne Davis would not discuss the specifics of the lawsuit but issued the following statement.

“CalPERS fully complied with California law on these matters,” Davis said. “We expect the court to reach the same conclusion and promptly dismiss the lawsuit.”

Meanwhile, the CalPERS board’s Governance Committee is aiming to implement a system that would allow board members to be notified when a top CalPERS staff member is under investigation. The discussion comes after several CalPERS board members said they were not told about an ethics complaint against Meng until after he resigned.

One of those board members, California State Controller Betty Yee, called in August for “swift and thorough inquiry to determine whether any laws had been violated or whether the pension system had suffered financial and reputational damage.”

Brown also said on Sunday that she only learned of Meng’s resignation after being contacted by the media.

“We were given no information by CalPERS management,” she told CIO.

Board President Henry Jones said in a statement after Meng’s resignation that CalPERS officials were aware of the matter and that appropriate action had been taken.

“These are private personnel matters and already have been addressed according to our internal compliance protocols,” Jones said.

Brown said the current proposal to notify the board when a CalPERS official is under investigation does not go far enough because it only applies to misconduct by the CEO, CIO, chief financial officer (CFO), chief health officer, chief actuary, chief operating officer, and general counsel.

She said key personnel at the pension plan, such as investment chiefs who run the pension system’s private equity, real estate, equity, and fixed income investments, are not included in the board notification.

“I would argue that we should know if any CalPERS official is under investigation,” she said.

The Governance Committee is also scheduled to discuss who on the CalPERS board can pick the CIO, in conjunction with Frost. After Meng’s resignation, the board changed its policy to allow members of the board to help select a new CIO.

But a new proposal coming before the Governance Committee this week would modify that plan and make the hiring, firing, and performance evaluation of the CIO rest with the seven-member CalPERS Performance, Compensation, & Talent Management Committee.

These issues are coming to the surface as CalPERS remains without a CIO. Originally, the pension system expected to announce the new CIO at its January 19 meeting.

But no new CIO was announced. On Wednesday, two CalPERS subcommittee will meet to continue discussions with candidates for the position that, with bonuses, could pay as much as $2.4 million a year.

Top CalPERS official Brad Pacheco, deputy executive officer for communications and stakeholder relations, told a stakeholders’ forum on Thursday that the search was continuing and is taking more time than originally anticipated.

Regarding the CIO’s potential salary, Pacheco said the number was reasonable because top investment officials can make more in the private sector and the position is subject to public scrutiny since CalPERS is a public agency, making it difficult to recruit qualified candidate.

Related Stories

CalPERS Not Ready to Pick CIO

CalPERS CIO Ben Meng’s Departure Linked to Questions on His Financial Disclosure

California Opens Investigation into Former CalPERS CIO Meng

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«