Hedge Funds Finally Nose Past the S&P 500

After too many years of drag-butt performance, they’ve taken advantage of a volatile 2020.


Hedge funds are finally edging past the S&P 500, a welcome plus for an asset class that has taken heat for underperforming in recent years amid the bull market.

The hedge fund composite had a very good November and ended up gaining 13.27% for 2020, versus 12.1% for the benchmark stock index, according to Preqin research.

What’s more, equity strategies, the class’ largest, did even better, up 14.49% for the year. Poorer showings in the past have sparked criticism because hedge funds’ relatively high fees didn’t deliver what a low-cost index fund did. Redemptions and fund closings have been rife, with even celebrated hedge operator John Paulson calling it quits in July.

Although hedge fund afficionados argue that hedge funds provide diversification and shouldn’t be judged against the stock market, many investors disagree. Hedge funds remain a key part of many pension funds’ alternative investments portfolio.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Stock-oriented hedge funds aim to ride hot momentum plays, but also to do a fair amount of shorting, betting on drops—a combo technique known as long/short. While stocks have surged since their February-March debacle, they’ve also done so with a lot of volatility, helped by an influx of retail investors of the Robinhood variety.

Result: happier hunting grounds for sharp hedgies as momentary darlings have tumbled. The climate for hedge funds, wrote Russell Barlow, global head of alternative investment strategies at Aberdeen Standard, in a report, is “attractive for long/short stock picking, as correlation between stocks has fallen since the peak of the crisis and volumes driven by retail traders have surged, creating inefficiencies in market pricing.”

Another hedge category, global macro (focused on currencies, interest rates, and other things affected by international economic trends), hasn’t done very well thus far this year, up 8.9%. Barlow, however, said he expects its prospects to brighten. Global macro, he indicated, is “an area in which we expect opportunities to arise as the policy response to COVID-19 varies across different countries.”

In terms of stocks, it’s intriguing that hedge funds’ 50 top picks did even better than the funds that own them. For 2020 through November, Goldman Sachs’ Hedge Fund VIP list of such names was up almost 40%. Its three largest holdings are exercise gear maker Peloton Interactive, Latin American ecommerce platform MercadoLibre, and social media giant Twitter.

Like the stock market as a whole, hedge funds like battered leisure stocks, evidently believing that these will romp further once the pandemic is over. A large such holdings for the hedgies is casino owner Caesars Entertainment.

Activist funds, which take positions in companies and agitate to make the businesses more profitable, also have done well of late, almost equaling the S&P 500. They lagged all year and then had a strong November. The same situation prevails for emerging market specialists, which anticipate a recovery in commodity prices due to an expected worldwide recovery and China’s current rebound.

Related Stories:

Emerging Markets and China Hedge Funds Likely to Outperform

Too Much Leverage, Too Much Risk Are Weighing Down Hedge Funds

Investors Redeemed Nearly $100 Billion from Hedge Funds in 2019

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Time Runs Out for Multiemployer Pension Reform in 2020

Senators Grassley and Alexander say it’s too late to include their plan in year-end legislation.


The clock has run out on multiemployer pension reform in 2020.

Republican Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee issued a joint statement this week saying there won’t be time to reach a deal to include the proposed reform in an end-of-year legislative package.  

“For the past two weeks, we have engaged in intense negotiations with our Democratic colleagues in the Senate and House to seek a deal to resolve the impending multiemployer pension crisis,” the senators said. “We have reached the point where we are out of time to strike an agreement that can be scored by the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] and reviewed by our Senate and House colleagues.”

A little over a year ago Grassley and Alexander released the Multiemployer Pension Recapitalization and Reform Plan in an attempt to prevent critically underfunded multiemployer pension plans from collapsing.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The plan proposed creating new powers for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) to take on liabilities from struggling multiemployer plans to help pay their obligations to retirees and current workers. The proposal also called for fundamental changes to the regulation of the plans to ensure benefits are appropriately funded and managed.

The senators said they hope to provide relief for the failing plans that cover approximately 1.5 million retirees should the PBGC’s insurance fund begin to run out of money in 2026 as projected.

“While we agree that significant federal funds will be needed to solve the current crisis, reforms are essential to ensure the multiemployer pension system can be self-sustaining and honor benefit promises over the long term instead of relying on taxpayers to bail out a private-sector system in perpetuity,” the senators said.

Structural, demographic, and economic challenges in the private-sector multiemployer pension system have put many of the plans in “dangerously poor financial condition,” the senators have said.

Although many pension plans have been able to improve their funded status since 2010, the ones in the worst condition after the 2008-2009 economic downturn are still deeply underfunded and face insolvency.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that 25% of critical-status plans face certain insolvency, with no possible combination of contribution increases and benefit reductions able to help them to improve their status. And according to the Congressional Budget Office, large legacy-liability costs are a product of withdrawal-liability rules established under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (MPPAA).

Under current law, an employer withdrawing from a multiemployer plan must make withdrawal-liability payments equal to their share of unfunded vested benefits.

Under the proposed plan, PBGC authority would be augmented to provide financial assistance through a partition that would improve the ability of severely struggling multiemployer plans to regain their financial footing by funding their legacy costs prior to becoming insolvent. According to the proposal, partitioning will allow the plans to fund benefit obligations more adequately with ongoing contributions.

“Since we introduced our multiemployer pension relief and reform plan last November, we have worked to strike that balance between relief for today’s failing plans and reforms to ensure taxpayers don’t have to bail out the system again in the coming years,” the senators said.

“The foundation of our reform plan is that all stakeholders have a role in fixing the system from the employers, unions, and pension plans to the employees and retirees.”

Related Stories:

House Committee Advances Multiemployer Pension Reform Bill

Multiemployer Pension Lifeboat Sinking Fast

Congressional Budget Office Finds Multiemployer Pension Rescue Bill is Not Enough

Tags: , , , , , ,

«