New CalPERS CIO Could See $2.4 Million Payout

That compensation is tied to five-year goals as part of an effort to reduce turnover at the largest public pension in the US.


The next California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) chief investment officer could see a $2.4 million compensation package—one of the highest for a public pension official in the United States—but superior investment performance will be necessary over a five-year period to achieve the maximum payout.

That potential compensation is up from the $1.8 million that former CIO Ben Meng could have earned if he achieved his maximum performance targets. Meng earned $1.5 million last year before abruptly resigning in August, just a year and a half after he took over the $414 billion CalPERS, the largest public pension organization in the US.

Meng’s resignation came after state ethics investigators launched a formal investigation into whether he violated conflict of interest laws when he oversaw investments in private equity firm Blackstone Group at the same time that he was personally invested in the firm.

CalPERS officials say the $2.4 million package, while high for public pension plans in the US, is aimed at recruiting a top-notch investment officer with extensive experience.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The compensation plan developed by consulting firm Grant Thornton is expected to be approved at a CalPERS board meeting on Nov. 18. Board members held off approving the plan at an Oct. 16 meeting because they wanted technical details worked out on the compensation package before they voted.

For the first time, the plan adds a long-term incentive, in addition to short-term yearly incentives, to the CIO’s compensation package. The fund would have to achieve compound annual growth rate returns of 8.4% over five years for the CIO to reach the maximum $2.4 million.

CalPERS targets an annual return target of 7%, a goal it has missed the last two fiscal years.

The compensation package keeps the base pay range of the CalPERS CIO at current levels, between $425,500 and $707,500.

CalPERS Chief Executive Officer Marcie Frost told the board on Oct. 16 that tying maximum compensation to staying for five years as CIO is intentional.

“CalPERS has really experienced quite significant turnover in its chief investment officer relative to its peers, and, in particular, the public pension space, and so we are really looking for a candidate who can make a minimum commitment of five years,” she said.

Meng lasted 18 months, and his predecessor, Ted Eliopoulos, served for four years.

The CalPERS CIO compensation is less than what a chief investment officer would make at a Canadian pension plan, but it would be competitive with other large global pension plans, Eric Gonzaga, national managing principal at Grant Thornton, told the board on Oct. 16.

Gonzaga acknowledged that the compensation would still be below what a top investment officer would make in an asset management firm.

“We’re not looking to pay somebody what the industry will provide. You’re looking for someone who is mission oriented and is willing to take essentially a pay cut from what they could otherwise earn in industry,” he said.

Meanwhile, consulting firm Korn Ferry is assembling candidates for the CIO job, Michael Kennedy, the recruiting firm’s senior client partner, said at the CalPERS meeting.

Kennedy said that even with a potential pay cut to work at CalPERS, he thinks the pension plan will attract top candidates.

He said CalPERS has a global reputation.

“And I think that’s going to differentiate it from just about every other US public pension plan,” he said. “And that’s why I think a lot of candidates here in the US are going to be excited to raise their hand to participate in the process, because they view this as an opportunity to lead the largest pension plan in the US but also to be viewed as a global investor and—and have relationships with pension plans all over the world.”

Kennedy said the person selected for the job will also need to know how to communicate effectively on television.

“This individual will be the one who you may see on CNBC and other media outlets more so than other public pension plan chief investment officers around the country, which is why, again, we need for this person to have very strong communication skills,” he said.

Frost told the board that internal CalPERS candidates “who are highly qualified” are also in the mix for the CIO job and that the pension plan wants to assemble a lineup of both internal and external candidates for the position.

The job posting for the CIO position says it requires a minimum of seven years of experience, which board member Stacie Olivares said at the Oct. 16 board meeting is not enough.

She said she wanted the CIO to have at least 10 years of experience.

Kennedy said he was looking for a lot more experience than 10 years.

“I can assure you that we’re going to be bringing very senior and seasoned professionals to CalPERS,” he said, adding that candidates his search firm had talked to so far were of that caliber.

Audience members and board members also expressed at the Oct. 16 meeting that they wanted the next investment officer to have strong ethics. It is a sensitive issue at CalPERS, not just because of Meng’s resignation.

CalPERS Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Charles Asubonten was forced to resign in 2018 less than a year into his job after it was discovered his résumé was falsified.

And former CalPERS CEO Federico Buenrostro Jr. was sentenced to 4 1/2 years in federal prison in 2016 for accepting more than $200,000 in bribes and trying to direct investments to a former board member who ran an investment firm.

Kennedy said the search firm would screen candidates carefully.

“We recognize that these are public pension plans. And, as such, you can’t afford to hire someone who doesn’t have high ethics and high integrity, “ he said. “So that’s something we’re going to be very, very attuned to.”

He added a grim note on the honesty of corporate executives’ résumés.

“You will be surprised at the number of executives who are in their 50s even in the country today, who, for whatever reason, their education was never verified, and they’re pretty senior in their careers, and now the CFA or the MBA from Columbia that is on the résumé is not really accurate,” he said.

Related Stories:

California Opens Investigation into Former CalPERS CIO Meng

CalPERS CIO Ben Meng’s Departure Linked to Questions on His Financial Disclosure

Board Member Sues CalPERS over Alleged Retaliation

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Einhorn: The Tech Bubble Has Already Popped

To hedge fund impresario, crazed IPO issuance, overvalued stocks, and nutty post-split advances speak of a peak: September 2.


You hear a lot about how the US stock market is in a bubble. Guess what? The bubble already has burst, says hedge fund honcho David Einhorn.

Einhorn, the head of hedge fund firm Greenlight Capital, wrote in his third quarter letter to investors that an overvaluation of stocks, a tech concentration, and an initial public offering (IPO) explosion have driven this market surge to unsustainable excess. That sentiment is hardly news.

But credit Einhorn for a decent, although hardly unblemished, record of good calls. He is famous for his early-on, pre-crash shorting of Lehman Brothers and his spot-on negative assessment of companies such as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters.

The market topped out on September 2, and while it has retraced some of that lost ground, it hasn’t returned to its high point. To Einhorn, “Our working hypothesis, which might be disproven, is that September 2, 2020, was the top and the bubble has already popped.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Indeed, the S&P 500, while up 4.9% thus far this year, has dipped 5.3% since September 2. Even more significantly, the Nasdaq 100, which covers the largest stocks in the tech-laden Nasdaq Composite, is off 6.5% since that date. (To be sure, it still is up 32.8% in 2020.)

The S&P 500’s top five stocks comprise 20% of the entire index, by the reckoning of Ned Davis Research. Ergo, in Einhorn’s eyes, too much is concentrated in too few stocks. But that’s not all: Einhorn pointed out that a bunch of lesser-known tech names have valuations exceeding $20 billion. Unjustifiably, in his view. Okta and ZScaler come to mind.

Einhorn has for some time shorted such high-fliers as Amazon and Netflix, whose valuations he considers ridiculous. Amazon sports a stratospheric price/earnings (P/E) multiple of 126, and Netflix’s P/E is 79.

Further, IPOs are way popular nowadays, with 343 of them launched as of Tuesday, 77% more than over the comparable period in 2019. Just this week, China’s Ant Financial Group announced a $35 billion offering. Jack Ma’s creation would be the biggest IPO in history. All this comes amid enormous uncertainty about the future of US-China relations, regardless of who wins the race for the White House.

The market’s behavior toward stock splits of certain tech darlings illuminates his burst-bubble thesis, Einhorn argued. Specifically, Tesla and Apple, both of which split in the summer. Usually, splits don’t get much market reaction: All they do is to make a share more affordable. Earnings and revenue aren’t affected. In the following weeks, up to September 2, Apple rose 23% and Tesla, 67%. They are down since.

Einhorn has been wrong before about tech bubbles. Example: He called one in 2016, only to be found off the mark as tech kept rising. He later wrote that he had “prematurely identified what we thought was a bubble.”

This year hasn’t been a wonderful one for Greenlight (assets under management: $2.6 billion), whose performance reportedly is down 16% through September.

Related Stories:

How David Einhorn Is Betting on Higher Inflation

Beware of Corporate Debt, Even Non-Junk, Says David Einhorn

How the Stock Market’s Tech Leaders Will Be Ousted

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«