Both Trump and Biden Will Bring Higher Corporate Taxes, PwC Survey Says

A daunting 70% of execs polled think either candidate will boost business levies to help pay for the added trillions in federal relief spending.


So, Joe Biden wants to raise corporate taxes and Donald Trump wants to lower them. A poll, though, finds that business leaders expect taxes to go up, regardless of who takes the oath of office in January.

According to a PwC survey of 578 corporate executives, 70% believe that federal business taxes will rise during the coming presidential term to pay for the enormous cost of fighting the coronavirus-driven economic slump. 

The survey indicates that 35% “strongly agree” that corporate levies will rise under either the Democratic or Republican presidential nominee. The poll covers top executives below CEO, with two-thirds of the companies polled in the Fortune 500.

“Their views likely reflect concerns that eventually there will be a price to pay for the increase in federal spending, tax deferrals, and other forms of relief,” the consulting and accounting firm wrote about the survey. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

On the surface, it’s odd to hear that corporate big shots think President Donald Trump, a Republican, would raise their taxes. Under Democrat Biden’s plan, the corporate rate would climb to 28% from 21%. Before the Trump-supported tax cut enacted in late 2017, the corporate rate was 35%.

In his reelection campaign, the president has proposed various tax credits designed to bring jobs back to America from overseas. But nowhere does Trump call for higher taxes, on businesses or individuals, in keeping with standard GOP beliefs.

Trump, however, is not an orthodox Republican, and already has turned his back on the party’s traditional abhorrence toward high federal spending and expanding deficits, even before the virus hit. Plus, if he wins in November, he will have a freer hand than before, when he needed to appease GOP factions.

Congress has authorized some $4 trillion in extra spending for economic relief, and $2.2 trillion of it has already been spend, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Both parties have been squabbling about the size of a follow-on package of aid.

No matter. Once, the corporate elite strongly supported fiscal prudence. That has changed, the survey shows: Business higher-ups now back more government spending to right the nation.

A majority of survey respondents said higher federal outlays are needed to increase consumer confidence (82%) and grow domestic production of essential goods (81%).

“There is resounding support among the C-suite for more from Washington to help boost the economy and improve the business environment under COVID-19,” said Tim Ryan, PwC US senior partner and chairman.

Related Stories:

Will the Election Make the Stock Market Volatile?

Endowments Unharmed by Tax Law Changes…So Far

How GDP and Stocks Do When Dems and GOP Control the Presidency and Congress

Tags: , , , , , ,

Investor-Led Climate Action 100+ to Judge Companies on Sustainable Benchmark

The standard developed by the global alliance of allocators and EY Consulting will be released next year to assess which businesses are leading the transition to net-zero carbon.


Investor alliance Climate Action 100+, backed by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and other allocators, told leaders of 161 of the world’s largest carbon emitters that it will start judging their progress curbing greenhouse gases on an upcoming benchmark.

Called the Climate Action 100+ Net-Zero Company Benchmark, the standard developed by the investor group and EY Consulting will be released next year to assess which companies are leading the transition to carbon zero, the group said Monday. Collectively, the group has 500 investors with more than $47 trillion in assets.

The allocator-led group urged leaders of the world’s largest carbon emitters to define business strategies and identify targets to reach net carbon zero. 

“We’re going to hold them accountable. We’ll assess their progress towards this call to action with the public benchmark next year,” Mindy Lubber, chief executive at advocacy group Ceres and one of the steering committee members for Climate Action 100+, said during a Tuesday media briefing. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“These companies have got to lead if we’re going to turn things around. They are too big, their supply chains too vast. We need their leadership,” Lubber added. 

Climate Action 100+, which started three years ago with advocacy groups, asset owners, and managers, is working with investors to transition their portfolios to align with the “most ambitious” goals of the Paris Agreement, or a pledge to keep global temperatures from increasing 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Progress toward that goal is a mixed picture in 2020. In June, climate activists scored a victory when shareholders at Chevron succeeded in voting for additional climate-related lobbying disclosures to ensure the energy giant’s activities are in line with the Paris Agreement. 

“Climate lobbying is an issue where we’re seeing more and more investor engagement and involvement,” said Kirsten Spalding, senior program director of the investor network at Ceres. 

Greenhouse gas emissions also briefly dropped this year when the pandemic stalled economic activity across the world. Masses of people who stopped driving cars or turned off the lights at their restaurants briefly helped clear skies over global city centers. 

But emissions have increased since the early days of the pandemic and the world is set to record its warmest five years on record, according to a report from the World Meteorological Organization, a specialized weather and climate agency for the United Nations.   

The Climate Action 100+ benchmark will judge companies on eight indicators, including whether they have set net-zero emissions targets for 2050, whether they have short-, medium-, and long-term reduction targets, and whether the company has a robust strategy to get there. 

It will also assess whether companies are aligned with the Paris Agreement, whether they have developed a set of disclosures to report on its sustainability targets, and whether they have appointed a board leader or committee to oversee those goals. 

Climate Action 100+ has five advocacy groups, including the Asia Investor Group on Climate Change (AIGCC), Ceres, Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC), Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC). and Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). 

The group forms the steering committee with representatives from an additional five asset owners and asset managers, such as AustralianSuper, CalPERS, HSBC Global Asset Management, French pension fund Ircantec, and Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management. 

Related Stories: 

Oregon Integrates ESG Formally into Investment Policy

Increasing Body of Evidence Bolsters Case for ESG Investing

ESG High-Yield Bonds Don’t Hurt Returns … But They Don’t Boost Them Either

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

«