Asness: Factors Could Be ‘Arbitraged Away’ by ETFs

“We can’t all tilt one way,” the AQR founder explained at an FEG investing conference.

The popularity of factor-based investing may prove its downfall as fundamental drivers are eroded, AQR founder Cliff Asness has warned.

Asness outlined how the rise of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking factor-based strategies might affect their future performance, during a question-and-answer session at Fund Evaluation Group’s annual investment forum.

“I worry about some of the other factors being arbitraged away more” than value, he said. “But we’re not even close to getting there.”

Asness previously defended factor investing in a blog post last August, arguing that value, momentum, carry, and quality strategies will continue to reap returns, “though perhaps not at the same level and with different risks than in the past.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

This week, however, he admitted to being “wide open” to the idea that the strategies might one day disappear.

“We can’t all tilt one way,” Asness said. “That squeezes the factor and it stops working.”

But while the end is in sight, Asness said he doesn’t think it has arrived just yet. Factor-based ETFs, therefore, could still perform in the meantime—it just depends on the factor.

For example, Asness said the value factor should continue to drive returns since its performance comes from the higher risk involved in buying cheaper assets, as well as investor behavior.

“It comes down to why you think that factor works,” he said. “Dumb luck is one potential answer, but I don’t think it is.”

Related: Asness: This Is Why Factor Investing Will Survive & Asness Debunks Fama’s Views on Momentum

Hedge Funds Post ‘a Trickle’ of Inflows

New capital hit just over $4 billion last month, a fraction of the average of $23 billion over the last six Februaries, eVestment reports.

Disappointing returns in 2015 have discouraged investors from committing new capital into hedge funds in 2016, according to eVestment.

February 2016 experienced just $4.4 billion in new investments into hedge funds, the data provider reported, falling short of an average of $22.6 billion of net new capital over the past six Februaries.

This February’s inflows also fell well below the previous worst February during that six-year period: $12.1 billion in 2010.

“February has historically been a month of elevated inflows for the industry,” the report said. “The dramatically reduced new investment into hedge funds this February reflects investor dissatisfaction with 2015 returns.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“The dramatically reduced new investment into hedge funds this February reflects investor dissatisfaction with 2015 returns.”The performance decline of $24.5 billion for the month in addition to the low levels of inflows brought down total hedge fund assets to $2.946 trillion, eVestment continued. This was the third consecutive month in which industry assets had fallen.

However, hedge funds that were able to post positive returns in 2015 were rewarded new investor capital in 2016. In the first two months of the year, investors committed nearly $14 billion in allocations to funds that reported gains of 5% or better last year, eVestment found.

In contrast, $28 billion was redeemed in the same time period from funds with negative performance in 2015.

Investors were bright on commodity strategies and fixed-income/credit-focused hedge funds, allocating $1.8 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, in February.

Managed futures funds also began to win over investors’ interest by gaining $3.61 billion in inflows, eVestment found, ending three consecutive months of redemptions.

Macro funds were the “biggest losers” in February, losing $2.78 billion for the month. 

Related: Why Public Pension Giants and Hedge Funds Don’t Mix & Investors Still Betting on Hedge Funds in 2016

«