Rebound Rally Often Has a Dip—And That Would Come Around Election Day

A bouncing-back S&P 500 tends to drop by 5%, two-plus months after setting a new record, says CFRA’s Sam Stovall. Would this impact the presidential race?


How much does the stock market affect the outcome of a presidential election? We may soon find out.

The S&P 500 surpassed its old record Aug. 18, the fastest comeback in history off its pandemic-driven winter low, and it has kept going. The index padded the lead Wednesday with a 1% advance.

Nothing rises forever, of course, and this rally could need a breather. History shows the broad-market benchmark keeps on trucking an average 5.2% after exceeding the previous high. Trouble is, according to CFRA’s chief investment strategist, Sam Stovall, the S&P 500 then tends to have a near-term correction—falling an average 5%.

And this happens around 2½ months after the new high. That would make it coincide with … Election Day. It resumes its upward trajectory after that, although the resumption may be cold comfort to the incumbent Oval Office occupant.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Lately, President Donald Trump in his re-election drive has been talking up the stock market’s resurgence. All is not well on the economic front, certainly. The nation still is in a recession, with an unemployment rate of 10.2% in July. Stocks, however, measure investors’ sentiment about what the future holds, and the S&P 500 has been optimistic for months.

Whether a November market slide would harm the president’s chances of victory is unclear. Hopeful news about a COVID-19 vaccine has helped equities, and there is no indication with so many companies working to find a vaccine that this momentum should slow.

What’s more, the Federal Reserve’s massive support for the economy and the bond market is not going away anytime soon. Signs of a burgeoning recovery are encouraging, such as new home sales accelerating faster than expected last month. And possible progress in US-China trade talks is a positive for the market, as well.

Further, other research has better news for Trump. If the S&P 500 is up three months before the election, which is the situation now, then the incumbent party almost always triumphs, an LPL Financial study indicated.

The last time the incumbent White House party was denied another term, as the market was tanking, was in 2008. That’s when Republican nominee John McCain (seeking to succeed George W. Bush) lost to Barack Obama. Yet that year may not be an apt comparison. Back 12 years ago, the economy was on the downswing. At present, despite hiccups on the road to recovery, that doesn’t appear to be true.

So who knows? Maybe stocks will maintain their high-flying ways into November without interruption. Maybe they won’t, and the effect on the election will be minimal. Politics aside, stocks appear poised for a decent run from here. As Stovall noted in his research note, “the bull market remained alive for an additional 37 months, on average, and a median of 24 months” after lifting off its trough.

Related Stories:

How the Stock Market Will Forecast Who Wins the White House in 2020

How GDP and Stocks Do When Dems and GOP Control the Presidency and Congress

Stocks Now Are the Spittin’ Image of 2009, Morgan Stanley Strategist Says

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Canadian Pension Fund Sues Walmart over Alleged Role in Opioid Crisis

Lawsuit claims retail giant failed to prevent opioid prescriptions from flowing into ‘illicit channels.’


The Ontario Provincial Council of Carpenters’ Pension Trust Fund is suing retail giant Walmart Inc. in search of documents to investigate potential corporate misconduct and/or mismanagement by its board. The lawsuit said the “demands arise from a troubling set of facts concerning the company’s role in the opioid epidemic.”

According to the lawsuit, Walmart “utterly lacked legally required controls designed to flag and stop the diversion of opioid prescriptions into illicit channels,” and it is “in direct violation of the Controlled Substances Act.”

The lawsuit said Walmart received notice from the US Justice Department of a “contemplated criminal indictment” and “contemplated civil claims” relating to the company’s failure to comply with the Controlled Substances Act. The suit also said the company “actively concealed the existence of the government’s criminal and civil investigations and actions, in direct violation of the federal securities laws.”

The legal complaint cited a ProPublica report that said Walmart entered into a secret memorandum of agreement with the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 2011 to bring its opioid distribution and dispensing practices into compliance. The article also said that with the knowledge of its board of directors, Walmart failed to implement the necessary measures required under the DEA agreement.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The ProPublica article also reported that there were two confidential letters sent by Walmart’s attorneys to the Justice Department discussing the Controlled Substances Act violations and alleged False Claims Act violations.

“Despite federal prosecutors contemplating an indictment of Walmart, Walmart failed to disclose this information to stockholders,” said the lawsuit, which added that the company “has a history of concealing harmful evidence,” and that it “concealed a litany of material information in its public filings, despite clear mandates that such information be disclosed pursuant to federal securities laws.”

The Ontario Provincial Council of Carpenters’ Pension Trust Fund is at least the third pension fund to sue Walmart this year over its alleged role in the opioid crisis. Earlier this year the Detroit Police and Fire Pension Fund and the Norfolk County (Massachusetts) Retirement System filed suit against the retailer, alleging it failed to monitor the sales of opioids.

In 2017, Walmart launched an opioid stewardship initiative “to identify concrete, high-impact actions to help fight the opioid epidemic.” As part of the initiative, the company said it restricts initial acute opioid prescriptions to no more than a seven-day supply nationwide, with up to a 50 morphine milligram equivalent maximum per day. It said the policy aligns with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s guidelines for opioid use.

Regarding the lawsuits earlier this year, Walmart told CIO that “there is no credible basis to conclude Walmart or its board engaged in any misconduct.” The company did not respond for a request for comment on the most recent lawsuit filed against it.

The Ontario Provincial Council of Carpenters’ Pension Trust Fund owns 15,975 shares of Walmart common stock, and has continuously held shares in the company since at least 2004.

Related Stories:

Tesla and Walmart Under Pension Fund Fire on Board Pay and Opioid Sales

Norway’s Pension Giant Revokes Walmart, Rio Tinto Exclusions

Michigan Police Pension Files Securities Lawsuit Against Prudential

Tags: , , , , ,

«