High Court Orders Firms to Pay £10.7 Million for Inducing Pension Transfers

Three directors found guilty of making false or misleading statements.


The High Court of England and Wales has ordered two companies and three directors to pay over £10.7 million ($14 million) in combined restitution to members of the public who were induced to transfer their pensions into self-invested personal pensions (SIPP).

The court ruled that Alexandra Associates of Warrington, England, trading under the name Avacade Future Solutions, and Manchester-based Avacade Limited made unapproved financial promotions through their websites, promotional material, and in telephone calls to consumers, and also made false or misleading statements.

The court also found that Craig Lummis and his son Lee Lummis, who were directors of both companies, and Raymond Fox, who was a director of Avacade Limited, “were knowingly concerned” in the illegal activities. Avacade Limited is currently in liquidation.

UK regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which brought the case,  alleged the two companies provided a pension report service and made misleading statements, which led consumers to transfer their pensions into SIPPs and then into risky investments such as tree plantations, Brazilian property developments, and office space available for rent.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The FCA said more than 2,000 consumers transferred approximately £91.8 million from their pensions into SIPPs. Additionally, approximately £68 million of that was invested in products promoted by Avacade and approximately £905,000 was invested into the Paraiba bond, a fixed-rate bond relating to a Brazilian property development that was promoted by Alexandra Associates. The regulator said Avacade and Alexandra Associates earned commissions of approximately £10.8 million from these investments, many of which have failed or are in liquidation.

The court has ordered Avacade to pay restitution of £10 million, and Alexandra Associates to pay £715,000. It also ordered Craig Lummis and Lee Lummis to pay £2.5 million each, and Raymond Fox to pay £1.7 million. Alexandra Associates, the Lummises and Fox have also been banned from engaging in regulated activities in the UK without authorization and banned from making financial promotions and making false or misleading statements about regulated investments. 

“The actions of those involved put the pension savings of thousands of people at risk,” Mark Steward, the FCA’s executive director of enforcement and market oversight, said in a statement. “Unregulated introducers, like Avacade, often try to skirt regulation by making false claims about the kind of service they provide. We urge consumers to avoid unregulated firms offering any kind of free pension review.”

Related Stories:

UK High Court Rules Women Not Entitled to Pension Compensation

UK Defined Benefit Code Revision ‘Biggest Revolution’ in 15 Years

UK Supreme Court Pension Ruling to Apply to All Public Sector Plans

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gold-Hater Buffett Joins Rush into Precious Metal

An odd choice for the inveterate value investor, who just bought a hot stock in a miner of the glittering substance.


Warren Buffett, really, really, really dislikes gold. He’s slammed it for years. Ummm, wait a minute. He just bought a bunch of gold mining shares, joining a stampede into the yellow metal.

His Berkshire Hathaway investment vehicle acquired a little more than 1% of Barrick Gold, shelling out $563 million, according to federal filings. The miner’s shares have appreciated 46% this year, even eclipsing the strong bull run in bullion itself, which is up 28%.

Getting aboard the gold fad seems incongruous for Buffett, who has long disdained momentum plays. And it seems especially odd due to his longstanding antipathy for the precious metal.

In his 2019 letter to investors, the Oracle of Omaha did a little math to show how poor a long-term investment the shiny substance is. He wrote that, if he’d purchased 3.25 ounces of gold with your $114.75—that’s the sum Buffett invested when he purchased his first shares of stock in 1942—it would have grown to around $4,200 over those 77 years. That, he wrote, is “less than 1% of what would have been realized from a simple unmanaged investment in American business.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

 “The magical metal was no match for the American mettle,” he added.

The leap into gold mining comes as Berkshire is unloading its stakes in banks, which have not fared well lately. He sold his remaining position in Goldman Sachs and whittled his holdings in such firms as JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo. The KBW Nasdaq Bank Index has dropped 29% in 2020. (Buffett did add to one bank holding, in Bank of America.)

In other words, he is dumping one of his beloved value plays for the hot new thing. Berkshire didn’t return a request for comment. Buffett is far from alone among sophisticated players in buying gold mining shares. Paulson & Co., headed by billionaire hedge fund operator John Paulson, also has been buying Barrick stock.

Buffett has dabbled in precious metals before. In 1997, he purchased 3,500 tons of silver, which then were going for cheap. So that was a value investment, which amply paid off, as silver prices ascended after the Berkshire buy.

Still, Barrick does fit the Berkshire value imperative in another way: The stock itself remains cheap. It changes hands at a price/earnings ratio of only 10.8, which is a third of the S&P 500’s multiple.  

Gold is, like commodities in general, volatile. And thus, Barrick’s fortunes are, as well. As recently as 2018, the company was losing money (down $1.5 billion). It has swung back into the black with the turnaround in gold.

The performance of bullion and its miners move in the same direction, although sometimes one gets ahead of the other. Usually, it’s the miners who lag because they have fixed costs and are subject to problems such as political disruptions in gold-producing countries (mainly in Africa), cave-ins, and labor trouble.

Related Stories:

Liking Gold’s Ascent? Just Wait for the Plunge, Study Warns

Hey, Washington, Buy Gold to Support Dollar, Guggenheim CIO Says

Warren Buffett: Wrong-Headed Hypocrite on Foreign Stocks?

Tags: , , , , , ,

«