Pension-Risk Transfer Inevitable, Says Russell

Frozen plans will offload their remaining liabilities eventually—it’s just a question of finding the right time, according to Bob Collie.

The relevant question for plan sponsors isn’t whether to transfer liabilities, but rather when to do it, according to Russell Investments’ research chief. 

All frozen defined benefit (DB) plans will be terminated eventually, Bob Collie pointed out. At some point, handing off lingering payout responsibilities to an insurer or some other third party just makes business sense. 

“If you’re frozen, at some point you will be doing a risk transfer,” he said in an interview with CIO.

Collie said interest in annuity buyouts has “really ramped up” over the last five years, with six deals in excess of $1 billion occurring in the US since 2012. Upwards of $260 billion in pension liabilities have transferred since 2007, according to Prudential, including $67 billion in US PRT deals.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

prudential prtSource: Prudential’s “Closing the Gap in DB Plans”When asked, 38% of corporate plan sponsors told Prudential they see PRT as a way to focus on the company’s core business, rather than pension risk management. An additional 35% said they viewed liability-driven investing as a path toward a full liability transfer.

But just because a risk transfer is the next logical step for frozen plans, Collie cautioned, doesn’t mean it ought be the next immediate step. 

“When the possibility of risk transfer is being discussed, it’s often, ‘Are we going to do this or not?’” Collie said. “The assumption being that we’re going to do this right now.”

Collie said pension plans can usually benefit from a hibernation phase—that is, continuing to manage assets and pay out liabilities after the plan has been frozen. Hibernation, he explained, allows time for the plan’s liabilities to “run down” as active employees leave the company or retire and participants and their beneficiaries die. The plan as a whole becomes less risky and the costs of offloading liabilities less expensive.

“The longer you wait, the more those liabilities get closer to being paid, and the better place that liability profile is in.” he said.

In addition to the plan’s liability profile, other factors sponsors should take into consideration when deciding when to conduct a risk transfer include how big the plan is, how much it costs to operate, and whether it is potentially destabilizing for the company, Collie said.

“There are both risk and cost elements of it,” he concluded. “It’s important to make sure you’re looking at it from every angle.”

Related: Pension Risk Transfers Climb to $260B & NISA: Partial Buyouts are ‘Expensive, Underwhelming’

Hilton Deputies to Split CIO Duties, No Search Planned

Randy Kim’s abrupt exit Friday leaves the top job vacant—and so it will remain, CIO has learned.

Hilton Buchman_Patel duoMichael Buchman & Yatin Patel, Investment Directors, Conrad N. Hilton FoundationThe Conrad N. Hilton Foundation has reassigned ex-CIO Randy Kim’s duties to two portfolio heads for the foreseeable future, spokesperson Marc Moorghen told CIO

Kim split with the fund Friday for “personal reasons,” Moorghen said, ending an eight-year leadership tenure.

Yatin Patel, director of public equities, and Michael Buchman, director of private equity and real assets, “will co-manage the investment team and portfolio.” 

“We are not looking to fill the CIO position,” the spokesperson said. 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The two former deputies joined Kim a few months into his tenure in late 2008, arriving from Barclays corporate development (Patel) and real estate finance (Buchman) positions. 

The two investment directors have begun taking on investment chief responsibilities, but will not change titles to interim co-CIO or otherwise. 

Neither Kim nor Moorghen would discuss the circumstances surrounding Friday’s breakup.“We are not looking to fill the CIO position.” “As a matter of policy, we don’t comment on details pertaining to the departure of an employee,” the spokesman said. The now-ex CIO, when reached for confirmation,  said he had resigned from the organization and declined to comment further. 

Kim joined Los Angeles-based Hilton in 2008, having spent the decade prior investing for his alma mater at the Yale Investments Office.

He named his former boss and legendary Yale CIO David Swensen as one of “very few role models” in a 2014 interview, as well as Notre Dame chief Scott Malpass. 

Kim’s ascent at 32 years old to brand-name foundation CIO indicated early a dominant generation of Yale investors, one seeding elite nonprofits. Last year, for example, former Yale colleague Rob Wallace took over Stanford’s endowment, and brought in another ex-Swensen acolyte—Kim’s own deputy

The five-member portfolio team remaining at Hilton will uphold Kim’s investment legacy without him, Moorghen said. 

“We remain committed to our existing investment strategy and our work continues as planned,” he noted. “Randy made a tremendous impact on our investment strategy during his time at the foundation, and we wish him the best in his future endeavors.”  

Related: Hilton Foundation CIO Randy Kim Exits  

«