At Least Boeing’s Stock Isn’t in Its Pension Plan Anymore

Controversial 2017 contribution of $3.5 billion in company shares to the retirement program apparently was divested, long before the current share-tanking mess.

Boeing stock, down 45%, is not a great place to be, given the grounded 737 MAX jets and the decline of airline orders. That kind of outcome is why Boeing’s big dollop of company stock in its pension plan provoked a lot of angst. 

In 2017, when the aerospace giant contributed $3.5 billion million of its stock to its defined benefit (DB) program, people evoked the Enron debacle, where a similar company allocation came to grief. Fortunately, it turns out that Boeing no longer has the stock in its plan, a good thing in light of the company’s poor fortunes of late. 

Three years ago, Boeing’s shares were flying high and headed higher. But the anti-diversification move of tying retirees’ and future beneficiaries’ benefits partly to the company’s future performance (the stock peaked in early 2019) seemed a stratospheric folly.

Well, just for the record: Boeing’s pension plan got rid of the offending stock—from the looks of it in the latter half of 2017, after owning it for a short time. This illustrates the power of either good planning or good luck.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

As of year-end 2019, the company’s plan—assets then: $61.7 billion—was 20.5% below fully funded. If the plan had hung onto the Boeing shares, it would be about $1 billion poorer today—this is the loss that the 2017 contribution of 14.4 million Boeing shares would’ve suffered. Now, that’s not much, just 1.6% of the fund’s assets.

But the optics of putting company stock into a DB plan were what touched off the carping three years ago. Critics hearkened back to Enron, the energy-trading company that collapsed in 2001. The Enron DB program held a large amount of company stock, but so did the 401(k) plan. All that was vaporized when the stock, once $90 per share, went to zero.

“It’s an irresponsible thing to do certainly from the perspective of the plan participants,” said Daniel Bergstresser, a finance professor at the Brandeis International Business School, of the Boeing stock contribution in 2017, according to Bloomberg News. “Ideally, you would like to put assets in the pension plan that won’t fall in value at exactly the same time that the company is suffering.” He didn’t respond to a request for comment now.

Nowadays, Boeing said its managers do not discuss individual assets in its DB holdings. But a review of company filings shows no employer stock at year-end 2017, nor in 2018 and 2019.

The company said in its 2019 filing that it “didn’t anticipate” pumping in more capital to the fund in 2020, although it might at a later date. Like many corporate plans, Boeing barred new employees from joining (as of 2009) and froze accrual of new credits for workers’ years of service (2014).

Boeing, once highly profitable, lost money in last year’s final quarter due to the MAX problem ($1 billion) and in this year’s first period also was in the red ($628 million) as COVID-19 decimated travel and airline orders. It suspended its dividend. Further, the company is laying off 13,000 workers

During Boeing’s April 27 shareholders meeting, management was asked: “Is there any risk to Boeing retiree pensions, given the current financial circumstances of the company?”

CEO David Calhoun replied: “No, there’s nothing I see in our future that would put risk into the pension plans.”

Related Stories:

Boeing Boosts Pension Fund by $3.5 Billion

Airline Stocks Fly High Despite Boeing MAX Mess

Re-Opening the Economy Won’t Do Stocks Much Good, Says Yale Expert

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Pennsylvania SERS Loses 11.69% in Q1

Tumbling equity markets helped weigh down retirement system’s returns.

The $31.1 billion Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS) reported that its defined benefit pension plan lost 11.69% during the first quarter of 2020, well off the pace of its assumed annual return of 7.125%.

The top performing asset class during the first quarter was private credit, which returned 2.47%, followed by private equity and Treasury-inflation protected securities (TIPS), which returned 2.4% and 1.43%, respectively, while cash returned 0.38%.

The worst performing asset classes were international developed markets equity and emerging markets equity, which tumbled 23.66% and 23%, respectively, followed by US equity, which lost 22.27%. The system’s real estate investments lost 2.26%, while its fixed-income investments were down 1.49% for the quarter.

In December, the Pennsylvania SERS board adopted a new asset allocation that was designed to reduce costs and increase the allocation to liquid assets that have a lower correlation to public equity markets. During the first months of 2020, the system completed its rebalancing to the new asset allocation, which it said provides increased security and diversification that helps the portfolio withstand market turbulence while paying retirement benefits.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The asset allocation is 48% in global public equity, 16% in private equity, 12% in real estate, 11% in fixed income, 10% in multi-strategy, and 3% in cash.

“We believe it’s important to continue to monitor our portfolio with an eye toward gauging liquidity, as we are doing, ensuring we have assets on hand to meet benefit payment obligations and to also stick to a long-term perspective,” Pennsylvania SERS Executive Director Terrill Sanchez said in a statement.

 “In times like these it can be easy for some to deviate from their investment policy statement and long-term plans, but they are designed to keep us focused on the right things through thick and thin.”

Pennsylvania SERS also received its 2019 Actuarial Report from consulting firm Korn Ferry. The results of the actuarial report are used to determine defined benefit plan employer contribution rates and provide information on the assets, liabilities, and funded status of the pension system. 

Korn Ferry said that based on the valuation results, Pennsylvania SERS is and will continue to be adequately funded. However, it also noted that Pennsylvania SERS’ 132,731 retirees and 102,850 active participants are a “clear sign” of a mature retirement system.

“The maturity of the SERS population heightens the importance of the mortality assumptions,” Korn Ferry said in its actuarial report. “Thus, the updates to the post-retirement mortality assumptions recommended by the actuary every five years based upon SERS’ actual ongoing mortality experience, have become increasingly critical to the annual valuation process.”

Related Stories:

Pennsylvania SERS Waives Minimum Required Payments from DC Plan

Bryan Lewis, Pennsylvania SERS’s CIO, Is Leaving

Pennsylvania SERS Returns 18.8% in 2019

Tags: , , , , ,

«