University of Texas Endowment Oil Money In Jeopardy

Top official of university organization that manages mineral rights for the endowment calls for Texas oil production cuts.

The CEO of University Lands is asking state regulators to order Texas oil producers to cut production by 20% in an effort to help save the cash cow that has made the University of Texas endowment the second biggest in the United States.

Declining oil prices are threatening the oil revenue so much that University Lands only expects to send $700 million to the Permanent University Fund this fiscal year, down from $1 billion last year. By 2021, revenue to the permanent fund could drop to $500 million if oil prices don’t move significantly, University Lands estimates show.

“I believe it is imperative that every effort be made to ensure the viability of oil and gas operators and oilfield service companies as their existence is imperative to sustained oil and gas development,” said Mark Houser, CEO of University Lands in testimony to the Railroad Commission of Texas.

The three-member commission, which regulates oil and gas companies in Texas, is scheduled to decide on May 5 whether to order the production cuts. One of the three commissioners, Ryan Sitton, supports the production cuts, but the other commissioners, Wayne Christian and Christi Craddick, have expressed doubts about interfering with the free market.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The price of West Texas Intermediate, the US oil benchmark, was down to $11.02 on Monday, its lowest price in two decades. Most oil companies need to make $30 or $40 or more per barrel to make a profit.

The Permanent University Fund has more than $30 billion in assets and Houser, in written testimony to the railroad commission, said royalty income yielded $8.2 billion over the past 10 years. He said approximately 1.4 million of 2.1 million university-owned acres in West Texas are leased for oil and gas, spanning 4,000 individual oil and gas leases.

Houser cited a recent survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City which found almost 40% of oil and natural gas producers would face insolvency within the year if crude prices remain below $30 a barrel.

“This implies that 100 companies operating on University Lands could become insolvent if there aren’t significant and quick improvements in commodity prices,” he said.

Big oil companies such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum have lined up against the railroad commission ordering cuts, arguing that the free market will sort things out eventually. The companies also have the capital to survive the current low oil environment, putting them at an advantage over smaller companies.

But Houser has joined with smaller oil companies in arguing that the cuts could help inch oil prices back up. Houser wants the Texas cuts to be made concurrently with other US states, arguing that cuts must be made jointly if they are to have an effect. Regulators in two other big oil-producing states, Oklahoma and South Dakota, have also been examining cuts.

The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in a global oversupply of oil as much of the world has shut down. Motorists aren’t driving and air passengers aren’t flying, sapping the need for crude.

Russia and Saudi Arabia reached an agreement last week to end a price war that had left production spigots wide open, cutting nearly 10 million barrels of oil a day from the 100 million barrel daily global supply.

But analysts have said that is not enough because there is still a global oversupply of oil of more than 10 million barrels a day.

Texas produces 5 million barrels of oil a day, about 40% of all US oil production but the debate in the Lone Star State is whether cutting production would be enough to bring prices up, even if other states joined.

In his testimony, Houser detailed how the future price of oil will depend on how much University Lands can contribute to the Permanent Fund.

“Our latest revenue projections for the next decade indicate that revenue could range anywhere from $5 billion to $6 billion assuming $35-45/barrel oil to $8 billion to $10 billion in a $50-$60/barrel price environment. This demonstrates the need for stability and consistent development,” he said.

The university has owned the land in the Permian Basin in West Texas since 1876. An oil boom in the early 1900s lead to the Texas legislature permitting the land to be leased to oil and gas companies and began the free flow of cash that is now in jeopardy.

Related Stories

Britt Harris Jumps Ship to UTIMCO, Pending Board Vote

Britt Harris, Texas Endowment to Review Investments in ‘Scrutinized Entities’

Harvard Adopts Goal for ‘Net-Zero’ Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050

Tags: , , , , ,

Bad Breadth: 5 Giants’ Market Dominance Is a Grim Sign, Goldman Says

History shows that the lofty status of Microsoft and its tech peers could lead to a deep market rout, the firm warns.

One-fifth of the S&P 500 is comprised of five giants, so then look out. That’s the message from Goldman Sachs.

“Sharp declines in market breadth in the past have often signaled large market drawdowns,” David Kostin, Goldman’s chief equity strategist, and his team wrote. “Narrow breadth can last for extended periods, but past episodes have signaled below-average market returns and eventual momentum reversals.”

The S&P 500 is 17% below its Feb. 19 record, but the median stock trades 28% down from that peak, they noted. At the same time, a mere five large stocks constitute 20% of the index’s market value.

Can you guess who those fab five are? No surprise, that would be Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft. The Goldman report pointed out that this quintet, with their tech market dominance and mighty balance sheets, were the leaders during the late, lamented bull market. Yet now, with so many smaller stocks in retreat, the five’s market concentration has only grown.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

All five report earnings this week, although just Amazon (blessed with the coronavirus-driven surge in online shopping) and Microsoft (benefiting from its booming Azure cloud business) are expected to post better results than the year-prior quarter. Of course, those two have stocks that are comfortably ahead in 2020, with Amazon gaining a heady 22% since January 1 and Microsoft up 6.25%.

Of the other three, only Facebook is below the 10.9% year- to-date decrease in the S&P 500. The social network has lost 13% since New Year’s. Google-parent Alphabet is down 9.6% and Apple 7.3%. Facebook and Alphabet are encountering falling ad revenue, and Apple is suffering from shrunken demand for its hallmark iPhones.

Well, the five tech monsters still command enormous capitalizations. The average market value of S&P 500 companies is $45 million. Of the big five, Facebook is the smallest at $605 billion, and Microsoft the largest at $1.42 trillion.

The telling thing is, as the Goldman report indicated, the index’s breadth narrowed right before the 1990 and 2008 recessions, as well as prior to the economic slowdowns of 2011 and 2016. In all of those cases, the market took a dive. Today, no one doubts that the US and the world are heading into a recession. The widespread Wall Street hope, though, is that investors saw the stock market low in February.

That faith may be misplaced. Reason: The market leaders’ stock performance doesn’t dovetail with their lofty valuations. And history teaches that the result is a bad share-price slump in these hotshots, what Goldman calls a “catch down” to their weaker counterparts.

And since earnings are a big factor in driving stocks, it’s unnerving that, with a quarter of S&P 500 companies disclosing first-quarter results thus far, a scant 36% have exceeded analyst estimates. This is the poorest showing since the 2008-09 financial crisis.

Related Stories:

The Worst Might Be Over for Stocks, JPM Says

Are Stocks a Bargain Buy Worth Taking?

What Bear Market? Why the More Solid Stocks May Be on the Upswing

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«