More Hedge Funds Close in 2019 than Opened

As stocks soared in 2019, the funds saw investor exoduses amid lackluster returns.

A common complaint: There are too many hedge funds. If so, that is in the process of being corrected. For the fifth straight year, the $3.2 trillion industry suffered more fund closings than launches, according to Hedge Fund Research.

During the past five years, more 4,000 hedge funds have been shuttered, leaving the count at less than 9,000 by most estimates. Big stars like Jeff Vinik and Louis Bacon closed their funds, to the shock of the entire industry.

Vinik, the former Fidelity Magellan chief, is returning money to investors. His funds were up a little over 4%. Vinik told clients it was more difficult nowadays to raise money. Veteran hedge operator Bacon—he’s been at this for more than three decades—logged a performance, he said is a letter to clients “in the low single digits.”

Indeed, the earlier enthusiasm for starting hedge funds seems to be waning. The number of launches last year was the second smallest this century.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The smallest was 328 in 2000, a recession year and one where the dot-com bubble burst. That is 60 below 2019’s tally. One glimmer of good news was that in November, the trend reversed, at least for the moment, with a net of $4.5 billion coming into the industry.

At the same time, investors pulled $81.5 billion out of these vehicles in 2019 through November, eVestment data show. A big reason is that the funds, on average, have failed to keep pace with the S&P 500 in a roaring bull market, the Bloomberg Global Hedge Fund Index indicates. The funds had a strong first half but sputtered in the second half.  They ended up gaining around 7.8% last year, less than one-third the broad-market index’s performance.

Hedge fund defenders say that these investing pools aren’t meant to best the stock market, but rather to be a buffer for when stocks tumble. More significantly, the industry’s advocates argue, is that the one-time clamber to get into a hot area has brought in a lot of marginal players who drag the average return down.

Assuming hedge funds’ inventory drops to a sustainable level, with the weaker names gone, the category may well look better as a whole. Certainly, some funds deliver eye-popping results, such as the four-year-old Singapore-based Vonda Global Fund, which almost quadrupled in value in 2019. It did so by diving into the combustible world of exchanged-traded futures, covering everything from commodities to government bonds to equities. It helped that those asset classes had positive returns for the year.

The fees structure of hedge funds definitely gives an advantage to their managers’ incomes, with 2% in annual management levies and 20% of any profits (many funds, desperate for investors, charge 1% and 10%). Plus, this is an investment segment that is endlessly inventive. For instance, hedge funds dedicated to cryptocurrency are springing up, with more than 200 in operation today, 10 times the number from five years ago.

Related Stories:

Hedge Funds Are Leveraging Alternative Data In An Effort To Transform The Industry

Sure, Hedge Funds Are Charging Less, but There’s a Catch

Most Hedge Funds Don’t Consider ESG Factors When Stockpicking

Tags: , , , ,

Arizona State Pension Is Headed for ‘Complete Desperation,’ Research Group Warns

Pension’s unfunded liabilities making it difficult to hire, retain teachers.

The Arizona Chamber Foundation (ACF), a research group, decries the Arizona State Retirement System’s (ASRS) dwindling funded ratio, which it claims is trending toward “complete desperation.”

As a direct result of the ASRS’ situation, the state’s educational environment degraded in an effort to help cover the pension’s unfunded liabilities. The ASRS quadrupled state teachers’ contributions to help mitigate their dwindling funded ratio, subsequently hampering the state’s ability to attract and retain teachers.

The pension used to have a $1 billion funding surplus in 2002,the group’s report contended, but since its issues began, it looked to teachers’ paychecks for help.

“By 2002, ASRS…had 104.% funds needed to fund beneficiaries, despite taking a modest 3% of payroll from ASRS participants,” the ACF said in its “Modernizing Teachers Pensions for the 21st Century” report. “Starting in July 2019, the system will have increased the burden on classroom teachers, taking 12.11% directly from teachers and other contributors and another 12.11% from teachers’ schools.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Additionally, the ASRS increased contributions from the schools themselves to 12.11%. The school contribution has a compound effect on teachers’ salaries, the ACF explained, meaning they have less room in their budget to provide pay raises for staff.

Despite schools and teachers paying four times more than they used to, the solvency of the system has continued to decline. “Arizona’s pension system for teachers has not yet reached the precipice of complete desperation, but it is trending in that direction,” the report reads.

One of the major consequences is lessened attraction of Arizona’s educational market to prospective teachers.

“By reducing take-home pay, the pension system can deter teacher recruitment efforts even if prospective teachers lack awareness of details regarding factors constraining take-home pay. In other words, prospective teachers don’t need to understand that pensions absorbing a large portion of payrolls contributes to a lower teacher pay—they may be deterred simply because they believe it is low,” the AFC report said.

Also, the structure of the ASRS’ payment scheme is duly antiquated. Currently, teachers must pay out contributions but won’t be completely vested in the system until they spend five years working under the system – a benchmark that only 30% of workers reach. As a result, the average teacher forgoes pay, but doesn’t receive the corresponding pension benefit.

“ASRS, in short, is built for an era in which people signed on with an employer, worked in a multi-decade career with the same organization, and then retired. This does not typify the modern American labor market in general, nor the current teaching profession,” the report said.

“ASRS, in short, requires modernization.” The AFC did not propose any solutions and said that is better to be suggested and coordinated by the pension’s staff.

Related Stories:
Arizona Pension Fires Top Executive for Sexual Harassment


Arizona PSPRS Consolidates 10 Asset Classes into 3


Arizona Evaluates over $1.5 Billion in Private Credit Investments

Tags: , , , , , ,

«