Princeton, Columbia Endowments Return 6.2%, 3.8%

Investment portfolios for both return less than half as much as last year.

Princeton University’s endowment reported returns of 6.2% for the fiscal year ended June 30, raising its asset value by $200 million to $26.1 billion.Columbia University’s endowment reported a meager 3.8% return on investment for the latest fiscal year to bring its value to $10.95 billion.

The 6.2% was less than half of what the endowment’s portfolio earned last year when it returned 14.2%.

Columbia’s endowment’s 3.8% return marked the second straight year that the university reported the smallest investment return among its Ivy League peers. Last year, Columbia reported a 9% return on investment.

“While we are disappointed that this year’s results were below our benchmarks for our target asset allocation, the longer term results reflect Columbia’s ability to perform across a range of market conditions,” University President Lee Bollinger said in a statement.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Columbia’s former CIO, Tim Donohue, left last month to manage the Kamehameha Schools, a private school system in Hawaii. Columbia’s endowment is currently managed by Peter Holland, CEO of Columbia University Investment Management Company, which manages the endowment’s portfolio.

Relates Stories:

Columbia Endowment Chief Heading to Hawaii

Columbia Endowment Reports 9.0% Return for 2018

Harvard Endowment Poaches Columbia COO Sanjeev Daga

Tags: , , , ,

SEC Stops $1.7 Billion Unregistered Digital Offering

Emergency order prevents markets from being flooded with illegal tokens.

The SEC has filed an emergency action and obtained a temporary restraining order against two offshore firms conducting an alleged unregistered digital token offering in the US and overseas that raised more than $1.7 billion of investor funds.

The order is intended to prevent the US markets from being flooded with digital tokens the regulator says were unlawfully sold.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Telegram Group Inc., and its subsidiary TON Issuer Inc., began raising capital in January 2018 to finance the companies’ business, including the development of their own blockchain, known as the “Telegram Open Network” or “TON Blockchain,” in addition to a mobile messaging application called Telegram Messenger.

To raise the capital, the SEC said Telegram sold digital asset securities called “Grams” to 171 investors for proceeds of approximately $1.7 billion, about $424.5 million of which came from the US market. However, the SEC said the firm did so without filing a registration statement for the Grams as they are required to do under the Securities Act of 1933.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“We have repeatedly stated that issuers cannot avoid the federal securities laws just by labeling their product a cryptocurrency or a digital token,” Steven Peikin, co-director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a release. “Telegram seeks to obtain the benefits of a public offering without complying with the long-established disclosure responsibilities designed to protect the investing public.”

The SEC said Grams are considered securities because the initial purchasers and subsequent investors expect to profit from Telegram’s development of a TON “ecosystem,” integration with Messenger, and implementation of the new TON Blockchain. It also said that Grams are not a currency because, among other things, there are not any products or services that can be purchased with Grams.

“Rather, there is an expectation on the part of investors that they will profit if Telegram builds out the functionalities it has promised,” said the complaint.

The SEC also said that if Grams were to hit the public markets, it would be “virtually impossible” to unwind the offering because many purchasers’ identities would be “shrouded in secrecy.”

The complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, charges Telegram and TON Issuer with violating the registration provisions of the Securities Act, and seeks certain emergency relief, as well as permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.

 

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Three in Alleged $125 Million Fraud

Blockchain Firm to Pay SEC $24 Million for Unregistered ICO

SEC Charges ‘Guru’ in Alleged Fraudulent Digital Token Offering

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

«