Ray Dalio Calls China the Quiet Winner in Conflict with US

The billionaire investment impresario sees the US as a weak force in the escalating battle.

Ray Dalio claimed on Tuesday that China is “for the most part quietly winning the geopolitical war.” He added that populist uprisings may lead to damaged markets, hampering America’s ability to ward off Chinese competition.

Dalio, Chief Investment Officer and co-founder of Bridgewater Investments, the world’s largest hedge fund, wrote in a LinkedIn postnoting that there are parallels between the current era and the late 1930s and early 1940s when the US limited Japan’s participation in the US economy.  In addition to an oil embargo that triggered World War II and pushed Japan to attack Pearl Harbor. Previously, Dalio called the trade war with China a “tragedy.”

“Time is on China’s side, as it is improving at a faster rate than the US,” Dalio wrote. He added that countries are having to choose between the US or China, with more opting to align with China because of its outsized trade presence and capital inflows. While the US military is superior, China’s abilities are rising, especially in the cyber realm, he said.

The numbers back up Dalio’s claim. The more Trump amps up the trade war, the more the U.S. economy suffers. Companies and consumers are paying more for everything from steel to socks. New York Federal Reserve economist Mary Amiti recently co-authored a study in May issued by the Centre for Economic Policy Research that found U.S. domestic prices rose “one-to-one with tariffs levied that year,” as Chinese exporters did not lower prices. Moreover, American supply chains suffered and there were fewer imported varieties of goods available.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Dalio predicted any impending economic downturn would be “socially and political ugly.” Such a scenario, he wrote, would require large fiscal spending and large budget deficits, with increased taxes on companies, more printed money of central banks and the buying of debts. Dalio predicted that as investors try to escape these constraints, it is possible that policymakers will turn to capital controls.

The economy has the largest wealth and political gaps since the late 1930s, Dalio noted. These, are leading to populist conflicts on the left and right that could undermine the efficiency of the economy and the federal government. Dalio sees this as a weakness for the US, predicting that the 2020 election will be “the greatest ideological clash” in our lifetimes, leading to tax law changes and wealth redistributions that will move markets.

Dalio echoed reports that the White House is considering ways to decouple the world’s two largest economies. He cited Senator Marco Rubio’s Equitable Act, legislation that ensures a process for delisting a Chinese firm from US exchanges if it doesn’t comply with US accounting rules and oversight regulations for three years. Citing national security concerns, China has been hesitant to let Big Four accounting firms inspect its companies. Bloomberg News reported on Friday that a U.S. Treasury Department spokesperson said there are no plans to block Chinese companies from listing on U.S. exchanges “at this time.”

Measures to limit China’s influence on US funds may be in the works.  Dalio noted industry concerns over US capital enabling Chinese firms when the lines between state-owned and private firms are eroding. 

Industry watchers   Dalio’s plan calls for Trump to limit capital in China, and includes freezing payments on debts owed to China.As well as using sanctions to inhibit non-US financial transactions with China. Dalio added that the president can apply capital and foreign exchange controls, freeze assets or payments on assets and force divestitures to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat” through emergency powers. 

Related stories:

Is China Unstoppable

Ray Dalio is Freaked Out by Trade War with China

Ray Dalio: We’re Not Bearish on China Yet

Tags: , ,

Yale, Stanford, Brown Endowments Return 5.7%, 6.5% 12.4%

Brown outperforms bigger endowments to reach record asset value.

The investment portfolios for the Yale University, Stanford University, and Brown University endowments returned 5.7%, 6.5%, and 12.4% respectively for fiscal year 2019.

Yale’s endowment, which is the envy of many institutional investors for often producing double-digit and outperforming its peers, reported a lackluster 5.7% investment return net of fees for the year ending June 30. The returns are among the lowest reported by  a major university endowment forfiscal 2019. The endowment’s asset value increased to $30.3 billion from $29.4 billion last year .

Over the longer term, Yale’s endowment performed better, returning 11.1% and 11.4% annualized over the past 10 and 20 years respectively.

Over the past 10 years, domestic equities returned 15.5% for the portfolio, beating its benchmark by 0.9% annually. Foreign equities produced returns of 16%, easily surpassing the composite benchmark by 9.9% annually. Absolute return produced an annualized return of 6.4%, leveraged buyouts returned 16.1%, venture capital returned 20%. Real estate and natural resources contributed annual returns of 8% and 5.7% respectively over the past 10 years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

And over the past 20 years, domestic equities had annualized returns of 11.4%, exceeding benchmark returns by 5% annually. Foreign equities returned of 14.7%, which was 8.4% higher than the composite benchmark.  Absolute return produced an annualized return of 8.8%, leveraged buyouts returned 12.6%, while venture capital returned a whopping 241.3% over the past 20 years.  Real estate and natural resources posted annual returns of 9% and 14.7%, respectively.

The endowment’s asset allocation targets for 2020 are 23% absolute return, 21.5% venture capital, 16.5% leveraged, 13.75% foreign equity, 10% real estate, 7% bonds and cash, 5.5% “natural,” and 2.75% domestic equity.

Stanford, another endowment behemoth, performed a little better than Yale, returning 6.5% for the 12 months ending June 30. Bringing its total asset value to $27.7 billion as of Aug. 31, up from $26.5 billion at the same time last year.

Stanford Management Company, which manages the endowment’s investment portfolio, said the broad universe of US colleges and universities generated a median 4.9% return for the same period, citing preliminary data from Cambridge Associates.

Stanford’s portfolio generated a 7.4% and 10.2% annualized net return over the last five and 10 years respectively, compared with annualized median returns of 5.1% and 8.5% respectively for colleges and universities over the same time periods.

“Our results were bolstered by significant value added above benchmark results in our public equity portfolios, where we have worked to upgrade our capabilities over the last three years,” Robert Wallace, CEO of Stanford Management Company, said in a release. “Performance in illiquid asset classes, including private equity, was strong in absolute terms but trailed our expectations in relative terms.”

And Brown University’s endowment returned 12.4% for fiscal 2019, more than doubling its benchmark’s return of 5.8%, rasing the endowment’s total value to a record high $4.2 billion, according to the Brown Daily Herald. 

The 12.4% return more than doubles the peer top quartile and peer median return rates of 5.9% and 4.9% respectively, and is so far the top-performing endowment among the other Ivy League universities that have announced their returns for the year. 

The 10-year average historical asset allocation for Brown’s portfolio is 30% absolute return, 23% public equity 21% in private equity, 10% real assets, 7% fixed income, 5% cash, and 3% equity-like credit.

 

Related Stories

Dean Takahashi, Yale’s Robin to David Swenson’s Batman, Exiting Endowment

Brown University President Rejects Israel Divestment

Stanford, Cornell Endowments Return 11.3%, 10.6%

 

 

Tags: , ,

«