New York Common Must Have 100% Sustainable Investments by 2030, Study Urges

Six-member advisory group calls on pension plan to adopt carbon-neutral goal of Paris climate accord.

By 2030, the $207.4 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund should ensure that all of its assets are sustainable, a study group recommended.

The report defines that as containing the earth’s rising temperature to be below 2 degrees Celsius over the pre-industrial level, as called for in the Paris Agreement. The accord seeks to create a carbon-neutral world by 2050.

The study group, convened by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, said the pension fund can do this by boosting its sustainable investments. Plus, it called on the retirement program to develop a new climate solutions allocation while creating minimum standards to put engagement and potential divestment from pollutants first.

“The transition to a low-carbon economy and the physical impacts of climate change are well underway, and New York must do more to be ready,” said DiNapoli, who oversees the pension fund.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Other suggestions in the report were for the fund to appoint a head of client solutions position to monitor the portfolio, and as well as adopt sustainability benchmarks. It also asks the fund to educate its members and partner with agencies such as the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, to establish a sustainable lending facility.

“Our panel of distinguished experts aimed high with our recommendations because we believe that urgent action is necessary to address climate-related risks and opportunities,” Williams said. “Adapting a portfolio as large as the New York State Common Retirement Fund to a 2-degree or lower future by 2030 will be challenging but it can be done over time with additional resources and thoughtful planning.”

Team members consist of six experts from financial, legal, environmental, and energy backgrounds who are voluntarily serving.

The group, dubbed the Decarbonization Advisory Panel, was tasked in March 2018 with studying the financial impacts of climate change and providing recommendations on how the pension program can help remedy the situation.

“To address the risks of climate change, New York will continue to take bold action to invest in the use of renewable resources, support the growth of sustainable businesses, and help build a clean energy economy,”  Cuomo said in the initial press release creating the panel. 

Related Stories:

Cuomo Calls on Common Retirement Fund to Cease Fossil Fuel Investments

New York State Comptroller Calls Out 4 More Companies on Board Diversity

New York Closes Out Year with over $15 Billion in Transactions

Tags: , , , , ,

Oregon Gov. Proposes Robin Hood Pension Solution

To fix state’s retirement systems that are ‘ill-prepared’ for economic downturn, Kate Brown plans to take from the rich and give their tax dollars to its poorly funded pensions.

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown released a plan to improve the funding for the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), in part, by keeping most of the tax refunds of the wealthiest Oregonians. 

Faced with a state retirement system that currently has a funded level of 80%, with rates projected to increase until 2035, Brown said funds for her plan would come from retaining part of the income tax kicker rebate, which she said disproportionately benefits wealthy Oregonians. She said she would give everyone the first $100 of their rebate and retain the rest.

She also suggested transferring excess surplus dollars from the state-owned insurance company or another similar transaction.

“Both of these options are framed as being extremely difficult politically,” said Brown. “But in reality, the choice is very clear: do you, state legislature, want to smartly pay down PERS debt to help our schools? Or do you want send out almost a billion dollars in tax refunds and insurance rebates?” 

“Today, we are at the height of our economic growth. We know another recession is coming at some point,” Brown told the state legislature’s Committee on Capital Construction. “The systems are ill-prepared for the next inevitable economic downturn, which will put both public sector budgets—and the retirement security of our valued employees—in serious jeopardy.”

Brown said that of the estimated $16.7 billion in unfunded liability, 72% is due to employees who have already retired or are no longer working for a PERS employer, 22% is due to currently employed tier 1 and 2 employees who were hired before 2003, and 6% is due to currently employed Oregon Public Service Retirement Plan (OPSRP) members, or tier 3 employees who were hired after 2003.

Another part of the proposals in Brown’s plan is to create a School PERS offset account to pay for the increase above the 2019-2021 PERS rates for schools until PERS is fully funded,  or for 14 years, whichever comes first. Brown said the cost will be about $400 million every two years, and that the account must be seeded with $800 million, and will require $1.6 billion over the following 14 years.

Brown also suggested beginning PERS stability contribution pension accounts for employees to secure the defined benefit portion of system. The contribution will equal 3% of payroll for tier 1 and tier 2 members, and 1.5% of payroll for OPSRP members after the first $20,000 of annual salary. With the exemption, the average contribution would be 2.1% for tier 1 and 2, and 1% for OPSRP.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Members would not see a reduction in their current take-home pay as a result of the contributions.

The proposed plan also stipulates that after PERS stability contributions end, if the funded level drops below 90%, employees will pay a temporary stability contribution of 3%—after a $20,000 exemption—until PERS’ funded status recovers.

 

Related Stories:

Oregon PERS Scrambles for Ideas to Bolster Public Pension Plan

Oregon’s CIO Prepares ‘Snarky Remark’ to Defend Millions in Fees to Fund Managers

Tags: , , ,

«