Monetary Policy Keeping Dalio Up at Davos

The founder of the world’s largest hedge fund expresses concerns about interest rates at global annual summit.

Ray Dalio, founder and co-chief investment officer of Bridgewater Associates ($160 billion), is getting nervous about monetary policy.

Dalio, speaking at a Fox Business panel at Davos, Switzerland’s global annual summit, lamented that interest rates had been lowered too much for too long by central banks in a stimulus campaign to combat the 2008-09 economic downturn. This led to investors flooding into riskier assets like stocks, he noted.


Compounding that was the Federal Reserve’s recent push to jack interest rates back up, but they did it too fast, he said.


The Fed moved “to tighten monetary policy at a level that was faster than the capital markets could handle and, as a result, we had a correction,” he said, pointing to its four hikes in 2018. Only lately has the Fed indicated it might ease off in 2019.


“We had an important change in Fed policy regarding what the direction of Fed policy will be in that tightening,” he said, adding that the “growth rate will slow, probably in a self-reinforcing process.”


At the same time, he added, rates aren’t high enough to give the Fed room to then lower them significantly as a tool to fight the next recession.


Fellow panelist and UBS Group Chairman Axel Weber agreed, saying that rates “in most of the western world were very low for very long, and markets have gotten used to that.” Weber added that rates may have been “too low” for the economic environment for the “better half” of the past five years. “When they started lifting rates, they tightened rates in a late-cycle stage,” he said.


Weber said that we might be going through a “soft spot” in the economy and that monetary policy normalization should come later. “They won’t get it done this time because the economy is weakening, and so I think it will be ‘mission aborted,’” he said. “They will look at normalizing rates in the next cycle, and then react to a slowing economy in the next year or two by a more muted, more cautious, more data-driven approach.”


Weber still has “one or two” rate hikes penciled in.


According to Dalio, China “has the power” to handle the slowing of its growth rate and the impacts of that cycle, but he is wary of how the US and Europe will be able to deal with the issue when it hits.

Next year, with presidential elections in the US, he also noted the proposal by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) for a 70% maximum income tax, which aims to hit the ultra-wealthy, will be an issue.

“What scares me the most longer term is that we have limitations to monetary policy which is our most valuable tool at the same time we have greater social and political antagonism,” he said. “The next downturn in the next economy worries me the most.”

Since our rates are still low, albiet rising, Dalio is concerned they are still too low where the Fed would not have enough time to give the US economy the shot in the arm it would need by dropping those rates if there were an economic problem.

He compared the current state of affairs to the environment of the late 1930s.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“[In] 1929-1932, we had a debt crisis. Interest rates hit zero. Then there was a lot of printing of money. Purchases of financial assets drives financial prices higher. It creates also, a polarity, a popularity, and an antagonism,” Dalio said. “We also had then at that time, the phenomenon of a rising power, like China, dealing with the conflict of an existing power. These types of political issues are now very connected to economic issues and policy.”

In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Dalio said there is “significant risk” of a recession in 2020.

Tags: , , , ,

How Long Do Retired Public Employees Live?

Actuarial study focuses on mortality rates for teachers, safety professionals, and general employees.

Teachers live the longest, with general public employees the next, and safety personnel come in last. That’s the result of a study by the Society of Actuaries, which created the first mortality tables that track the life expectancies of public pensioners.

After reviewing 46 million life-years and 580,000 deaths from 78 public plans and 35 public pension systems in the US between 2008 and 2013, the actuaries found that teachers have the longest life expectancy at age 87.7 in men, 90.03 for women. General employees live an average of 85.49 (male) and 88.48 (female), while safety professionals usually die at ages 85.27 (male) and 87.68 (female).

These numbers also mean larger pension obligations for teachers’ pension plan officials.

The society’s tables also noted that a higher income may link to lower mortality. According to the data, income beat job category as the top mortality factor.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“People who participate in higher-income plans are often associated to having some sort of health and wellness benefits, and that leads to better access at times to care,” Dale Hall, the society’s managing director, told CIO, adding that those with more disposable income allows for greater flexibility in case of an emergency as well as the ability to lead healthier lifestyles.

The study was conducted after the organization saw a difference in mortality levels during its review of private pensions.

“We wanted to provide new updated mortality information specifically for public retirement plans that then actuaries and the plan sponsors could use to assess what the funded status and what the liability in the plan can be given the variety of assumptions,” Hall said.  

For these expectations to be met, a plan typically has a yearly evaluation where the actuary working with the plan sponsor, looking at such items as mortality and mortality improvement, investment assumptions, inflation, and others. Said Hall, “It helps shed some light on another data point that people could look at to help those assumptions.”

Since the financial impact of the table’s conclusions will vary based on job category, the Society of Actuaries said it “encourages professionals in the field to perform their own analysis” to understand them and what it means for each plan and/or pension system’s funding status.

“This is hopefully a helpful piece of information that allows a state to assess its liability again and set assumptions including mortality in conjunction with a lot of other things to see what the current liability will be and, in turn, that probably helps them make funding decisions,” said Hall.

Tags: , , , ,

«