UC Endowment, Pension Plan Post Healthy 2017 Returns

CIO warns of leaner days ahead.

The $11.4 billion University of California endowment had investment returns of 14.6% in the 2017 calendar year, while the university’s $66.6 billion pension plan produced returns of 16.7%, show statistics released Tuesday. However, university investment officials warned that 2018 may look a lot grimmer.

“These markets have run up far beyond what we thought they should,” UC Chief Investment Officer Jagdeep Singh Bachher told the Regents Subcommittee on Investments Tuesday. “If anything, if I can predict out, let’s hope there is no disaster to count off, maybe we have strong absolute numbers on a relative basis…maybe we’ll be likely flat or negative. For what it’s worth, we’ll try to manage risk going forward.”

Investment Subcommittee Chairman Richard Sherman told CIO that the university investment office is “navigating uncertain markets.”

“Expectations going forward are much lower,” he said. “We experienced great public markets obviously the last 10 years since 2009.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Bachher said at the meeting that he wants the investment office to potentially use its cash position to buy some “good defensive assets” before the end of the university fiscal year on June 30.

The UC endowment has a $1.1 billion cash position, while the pension plan has $5 billion in cash.

UC investment officials Tuesday cited one possible area of expansion: building up real assets, including real estate.

The UC endowment has traditionally lagged other major university endowments in private markets.

UC statistics show that real asset investments make up only around $700 million of the $11.4 billion endowment. The pension plan also has a relatively small real estate portfolio, just under $4 billion.

In another major initiative, Bachher told the investment subcommittee that his office continues to reduce the number of external investments managers.

He said when he took the role in April 2014, there were 340 outside managers. Now the number is around 120, and the ultimate goal is the reduction of another approximately 20 managers.

“I would like it to be around 100,” he said. “It keeps our life simple. Less is more is important, but keeping it simple is really important, too. That is where the bulk of the work is left.”

Bachher did not offer a timetable for the additional reductions. He said the reductions have saved the university around $300 million, which could increase to as much as $500 million when additional managers are terminated.

Sherman said fewer managers have given the university more negotiating power to obtain fee reductions.

Many of the manager reductions have occurred in the equities asset class and are part of a program to manage more equity strategies in-house.

Scott Chan, a senior management director at the UC Investment office, told the investment subcommittee Tuesday that the number of outside equity managers for the UC endowment had dropped to 13 currently from 42 when Bachher took over in 2014.

Chan told CIO that most of the 13 managers specialize in equity strategies that invest outside the US, where specialized investment expertise can still make a difference in producing excess returns.

Tags: , , ,

UK University Strikes Continue after Union Rejects Pension Deal

UCU gearing up for additional 14-day strike during exam, assessment period.

After it seemed that a major UK pensions strike had reached a Monday deal, the union soundly rejected the proposal the following day, with a second wave of strikes planned.

The strike between Universities UK (UUK) and the University and College Union (UCU), now in its fourth week, has seen several discussions over changes to the University Superannuation Scheme’s defined benefit plans. If the UCU had supported the deal, the strike, in which 65 universities are participating, would have been suspended Wednesday. Much to the disappointment of UUK, the UCU chose to continue to strike for a proper deal after Tuesday discussions at its headquarters and responses from several of its union branches.

As per the proposal, defined benefits were to be protected under transitional arrangements that would begin April 1, 2019, and last until 2022. During this time, university employers and employee contributions would have increased to 19.3% and 8.7%, respectively. Both sides were also to explore risk-sharing alternatives, such as collective defined contributions.

“Branches made it clear today that they wanted to reject the proposal. UCU’s greatest strength is that we are run by and for our members and it is right that members always have the final say,” UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said in a statement. “The strike action for this week remains on and we will now make detailed preparations for strikes over the assessment and exam period. We want urgent talks with the universities’ representatives to try and find a way to get this dispute resolved.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Union branches rejected the proposals almost immediately after they were announced Monday.

“Members in our branch and across the country did not join one of the most impressive shows of collective solidarity in the face of restrictive trade union laws for a compromise offer that does not guarantee them decency in retirement,” Liverpool UCU said in a statement shared on social media. “Liverpool UCU calls on all branches to reject this unacceptable offer and demand that UCU ensure a deal is brought about that is commensurate to the sacrifice of their members.”

Last week, the UCU warned that if the pension dispute was not resolved, an additional 14 days of strikes would occur, hitting the exam and assessment periods between April and June. In the announcement, the UCU said it would gather information on which strike period would hit which universities the hardest.

Tags: , , ,

«