Mercer: Tax Reform, Quant Tightening among Top Priorities for DB Plans in 2018

New whitepaper urges plans to create a strong defense against economic, political shocks.

Tax reform, developing an investment governance model, and keeping a keen eye on monetary and fiscal policy levers were among the 10 items defined benefit (DB) pension plan sponsors should focus on, according to a 2018 investment outlook from global consulting firm Mercer.

As the year begins to build from the steady first month, understanding the new tax reform and its time-sensitive implications for pension funding strategies topped the list. Mercer’s studies found that after assuming lower taxes, 75% of plan sponsors had either considered accelerating their pension funding or had done so in 2017. An additional driver for meeting shorter funding thresholds was reducing Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) variable rate premiums and funding over a shorter duration.

Mercer determined that many DB plans will take the reductions sooner rather than later, basking in the potential benefits of better earnings, reduced premiums, neutralized impact on deferred tax assets, and a ramped-up movement along an existing glide path. Upon the realization of these benefits, Mercer also expects contribution increases to rise.

The second priority DB plans have is preparing for a transition from quantitative easing to tightening. Monetary and fiscal policy levers are weaving in opposing directions due to a federal tightening as the administration seeks fiscal stimulus expansion. Although markets are still bullish, this could cause funded status to either fall or move sideways. Pension liabilities will also be extremely sensitive to movements in discount rates.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“DB plan sponsors face a host of challenges and powerful, priority opportunities in a rapidly changing environment of corporate tax reform, Fed tightening and emerging inflationary pressures. All of these factors could have a significant impact on pension funding and risk transfer,” Michael Schlachter, US Defined Benefit Leader, Mercer, said in a statement. “As a result, plan sponsors are looking to take bigger deductions from increased contributions, address shrinking investment returns during the late stage of the credit cycle, and prepare for accelerated risk transfer.”

In addition to identifying proper risk transfer strategies, driving the performance of investment returns, and managing private asset classes, backing up equities and riskier investments with a strong defense against shocks and declining optimism was also high on Mercer’s list. Economists have said that a market correction is on the horizon for some time, and each day brings us closer to that reality. In addition, geopolitical tension is also an issue as well as speculation of the end of an economic cycle. The firm suggests pension plans prep for the possible implications by ensuring their bond portfolios are tailored to the specific liabilities and investment strategies of each plan. Mercer also says pension plans could also consider explicit and implicit hedges, accelerated glide paths, defensive tilts, and high-quality cash for added flexibility.

Outsourced CIOs (OCIOs) have become a growing trend across pensions, and Mercer has identified that if more plans are willing to do this, they need to develop an investment governance model to see what can be gained from this move before jumping to a new model. Another concern is the need to address data gaps and challenges before de-risking.

“Plan sponsors who understand and implement available smart strategies to address market and regulatory dynamics will be better positioned to maintain resilient, fiscally sound DB plans,” Schlachter said. “We’re entering a period of unprecedented change marked by a combination of simultaneous factors never seen before. Managing a fund to successfully meet its obligations and deliver winning outcomes requires keen insight and commitment to data analytics and agility.”

The full whitepaper can be accessed here.

Tags: , , ,

Carillion Ignored Advice to Boost Pension

Consultants said the collapsed company could have afforded ‘materially higher’ pension contributions.

Carillion ignored an assessment from its consultants that the construction company could have contributed more to its pension fund before its collapse, but instead prioritized share price over deficit reduction, according to documents released by a UK parliamentary committee.

In February 2012, Gazelle Corporate Finance, an independent covenant adviser, wrote to Carillion’s board of trustees with advice based on its assessment of the Carillion covenant in respect to recovery plan negotiations, and improving the structure of covenant support.

“Our report highlights the strong affordability of pension deficit contributions under the current recovery plans,” said Gazelle in its letter to Carillion, adding that it could afford to contribute more than £64 million ($91.4 million) per year to all of its pension plans while maintaining a metric of two times free cash flow cover. It also said that this would result in a recovery plan length of six to 10 years, compared to the 15-year plan that had been proposed.

“Carillion can, therefore, afford materially higher deficit contributions,” said Gazelle.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The adviser also said that Carillion was too focused on increasing its share price, and needed to strike a better balance with its deficit reduction strategies.

“Carillion has historically prioritized other demands on capital ahead of deficit reduction in order to grow earnings and support the share price,” wrote Gazelle. “We recommend the establishment of a proportionate link between increasing profitability and the progressive dividend policy, and enhanced deficit repair, structured around a benchmark by which the investment community assesses Carillion.”

On Jan. 15, Carillion entered into insolvency, along with several subsidiary companies in the group. All companies will continue to operate, providing continuity of public services, until further notice. The official receiver has been appointed as liquidator of Carillion Plc, and is now responsible for the day-to-day control and management of the liquidated companies in the group. Partners at PwC have been appointed as special managers to assist.

 

Tags: , ,

«