Survey Shows Corporate Pensions Improved in ’09, but Troubles Persist

Standard & Poor's 500 companies' aggregate U.S. and non-U.S. pension deficit and average funded status showed signs of optimism last year -- as of December 31, the average funded status increased to 84%, up from 78% a year earlier. 

(February 18, 2010) – A recent report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch shows companies improved pension funding in 2009.

According to the report, multinationals had an aggregate plan deficit of $227 billion last year, down from $295 billion in 2008.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

US plans were 84% funded as of December 31. In comparison, non-US plans were 80% funded. At the end of 2009, while companies had $1.198 trillion combined in US pension assets and a deficit of $188.7 billion, their non-U.S. pension assets totaled $189.5 billion, with a deficit of $38.6 billion.

Pre-tax pension expense will likely increase to $42 billion in 2010 from $35 billion in 2009, the report showed. Companies with the largest expected pension expense increase in 2010 include Black & Decker, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin, while firms where pension expenses are expected to decrease the most in 2010 include Aetna, Goodrich and JC Penney.

In terms of dollars, Lockheed Martin had the largest deficit, followed by Exxon Mobil and Ford Motor Co.

On a percentage basis, the report stated that financials, including banks, insurance and real estate, were expected to be the best funded sector as of year-end 2009 at 96% funded, while energy is expected to be the worst funded at 74%.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

CalPERS Names 11 Firms Not Responding on Placement Agents

The $200 billion pension fund has stepped up its oversight on placement agents or pension-fund middlemen.

(February 17, 2010) – The California Public Retirement System (CalPERS) released details on 11 firms that have failed to answer a request for information on their use of placement agents, Reuters reported.

 

Since last year, the biggest US public pension fund, with assets under management totaling more than $200 billion, has been in the spotlight for disclosing that a placement agent collected more than $58 million in fees for representing investment firms at the fund.

 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Documents released earlier this year showed middlemen earned $125 million from private investment funds for arranging deals with CalPERS, causing the fund to pledge an increase in transparency.

 

CalPERS has sought details about placement agents hired by its investment partners, the investments they promoted and the fees they were paid. The fund is backing legislation to regulate middlemen as lobbyists, according to Reuters, which would cause the activities of placement agents to come under heightened scrutiny.

 

The following firms have not responded to CalPERS’ original request for information on placement agents:

 

  • EnerTech Capital
  • Fenway Partners
  • GTCR
  • Information Technology Ventures
  • Markstone Capital
  • Pinnacle Ventures
  • Ripplewood
  • TSG Capital
  • Stark Investments
  • AREA Property Partners
  • Page Mill Advisors


To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«