Judge Tosses Out Former Pension Fund CIO's Fraud Case in New Mexico

District Judge Stephen Pfeffer dismissed the pay-to-play lawsuit filed by Frank Foy, former CIO for the New Mexico Educational Retirement Board.

(April 30, 2010) — A New Mexico judge rejected a pay-to-play lawsuit filed by Frank Foy, a former chief investment officer for the $8.3 billion New Mexico Educational Retirement Board. The suit sought to recoup millions of dollars in state funds lost through investments in mortgage- backed securities sold by a firm whose executives donated to New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign.

“We are analyzing the judge’s ruling and its implications on the law that could impact this and other cases in the near future,” said Phil Sisneros, a spokesman for Democratic Attorney General Gary King said to the AP. “We do expect that the appellate courts will have to weigh in at some point.”

Foy, who retired as CIO in 2008, aimed to recover $150 million to $230 million in taxpayer money for the state because of alleged fraud and a “pay-to-play” scheme involving public investments. District Judge Stephen Pfeffer in Santa Fe dismissed the whistleblower lawsuit. He said in an April 28 decision that the actions at issue preceded the law under which the case was filed — the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, which took effect in 2007. The money-losing investments began in 2004. The judge said it’s unconstitutional to apply the law and its sanctions to activities that occurred prior to July 2007, when the statute went into effect.

Foy claimed that as much as $243 million in state funds were used to buy “worthless” collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, sold by Chicago-based Vanderbilt Capital Advisors. In the suit, Foy stated that as much as $22 million in finder’s fees were shared by the son of a political ally of Richardson, a Democrat. The dismissed suit was filed in the summer of 2008 under seal, but was made public in January of 2009. It was later amended to include Marc Correra, whose father, Anthony, is a friend and political supporter of Richardson. State records show Vanderbilt paid $5.6 million in fees to Correra or his associates, according to Bloomberg.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Pay-to-play has become an increasingly hot-button issue in recent news. Following an investigation of the $110 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund (CRF) last year that revealed the role of middlemen, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed banning investment managers from paying placement agents to solicit government pension funds.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Emails Show Credit Default Swaps Led to Harvard Loss, Goldman Gain

The nation's oldest and richest university entered the $500 million credit default swap market.

(April 30, 2010) — According to emails released by a Senate committee, credit default swaps with Goldman Sachs were part of the Harvard Management Company’s investment strategy in 2007 that exposed the University to losses.

Harvard entered the $500 million credit default swap with Goldman paying about 100 basis points, or $5 million, per year for protection against defaults, the university newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, reported. As the real estate market tumbled, credit default swap rates increased to 200 basis points. While Harvard suffered losses, Goldman Sachs positioned itself to profit.

This trade was part of an investment strategy that is “no longer pursued” at Harvard Management Company, which invests the University’s endowment, said university spokesman John D. Longbrake, according to the article. It is unclear the amount Harvard lost.

The emails released follow the Securities and Exchange Commission’s fraud suit against Goldman Sachs. The government has accused the Wall Street giant of failing to disclose conflicts in mortgage securities, which cost investors more than $1 billion and fueled the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Goldman profited by betting against the mortgage investments it marketed to its customers while the housing market crumbed. Goldman has denied wrongdoing.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«