California's Attorney General Expresses Shock Over CalPERS' Blind Eye on Runaway Salaries for Top City Officials

The nation's largest pension system did not take action when it first heard about officials in the lower-income city of Bell, California, earning inflated salaries.

(August 9, 2010) — According to a report obtained by the Los Angeles Times, California’s $204.4 billion state pension fund was aware of inflated pay to a Bell, Calif., city administrator and other top city officials but did not take action. Now, they are in the process of reviewing the pension benefits of system participants who earn more than $400,000 a year.

“We are taking immediate action to investigate whether salaries of top public officials are being reported correctly and in accordance with the laws and rules that govern our system,” said CalPERS Chief Executive Officer Anne Stausboll in a statement. “We are committed to increased transparency and will take all steps necessary to protect our members, employers and stakeholders.”

According to the LA Times, California’s attorney general says he is shocked that nobody at the fund alerted law enforcement, and even board members at CalPERS are at a loss for words as to why the scheme wasn’t proactive about handling out-of-control salaries. In 2006, during a routine audit, the state pension fund learned that Bell City Manager Robert Rizzo had received a nearly 50% salary increase the previous year. The pay hike put his salary at $442,000, when CalPERS is supposed to stop pay spikes that can unduly enlarge retiree pensions. Rizzo’s salary eventually ballooned to nearly $800,000.

In addition to the fund’s review of high public official salaries, CalPERS stated it is:

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

  • Joining the California Attorney General to investigate the facts surrounding the salaries and other compensation of City of Bell officials;
  • Conducting a second CalPERS review of Bell;
  • Placing on hold the retirement accounts of the individuals under investigation in the City of Bell and committing not to approve any pensions until satisfied the pensions are appropriate under the law; and
  • Working with members of the Legislature and the League of California Cities on potential legislation to address issues of transparency in local governments.

“We followed all the existing pension rules related to Bell four years ago, but it is clear that we need to work toward strengthening our regulations and possibly state law,” stated Stausboll.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Rumors Swirl Around Potential SDCERA CIO Insourcing

While reports have the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association considering a move towards internalizing their asset management, current outsourced CIO Lee Partridge denies he is considering the move.

(August 9, 2010) – According to reports, the $7.4 billion San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA) is contemplating appointing Lee Partridge as in-house chief investment officer and bringing about 17 new investment staff members on board – but Partridge himself is denying that he is considering such a move.

Pensions & Investments is reporting that Partridge, who currently handles the pension’s CIO duties on an outsourced basis, will work with board CEO Brian White to find ways to better handle staff shortages. Partridge was hired October 1, 2009 with an annual base pay of $535,000, and could be paid $886,000 in salary and bonuses under one of the proposals, according to Pensions & Investments. Under another proposal, investment staff would grow to 30 from 17.

However, when contacted by ai5000, Partridge denied that he is considering the move. “I have not discussed the possibility of becoming an employee of SDCERA with anyone,” Partridge told ai5000. “Frankly, I doubt that will be the direction this takes and it certainly isn’t something I’m considering.”

Additionally, Pensions & Investments is reporting that the SDCERA board is looking into hiring an outside consulting firm to analyze the costs of a larger in-house staff compared to outsourcing some of the jobs by studying the salaries of public pension funds, private pension funds, endowments and the private sector.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

In April, while a new outsourcing plan was designed to help the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA) boost performance and efficiency, the SDCERA board decided to not outsource the rest of its investment staff to Integrity Capital Services due to concerns over conflicts of interest. Partridge, formerly deputy CIO of the Texas Teachers’ Retirement System, had told the county it could save $25 million by outsourcing the whole investment department and offered his own company.

Janet Levine, partner with law firm Crowell & Moring representing SDCERA, said hiring Integrity would be a conflict of interest as the firm was also involved in recommending the outsourcing of the staff. “I think we should look at other alternatives,” said Douglas Rose, board chairman.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

«