Survey Shows SWF Acquisitions Double in H1, Reflecting Confidence in Global Markets

A report released this week shows the number and value of acquisitions made by sovereign wealth funds followed by the Monitor Group and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) doubled in the first half of 2010, with SWFs spending the most money in Europe, which accounted for 40% of the total expenditure, followed by North America, which accounted for about a third of the total value of deals, or about $7.5 billion.

(October 21, 2010) — The number and value of acquisitions by sovereign wealth funds doubled in the first half of 2010 compared to the same period the previous year, according to a report by the Monitor Group and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) — an international research center based in Milan, Italy.

The increase in activity illustrates the increasing confidence in global markets, the report said. “Though the value of SWF investment in H1 2010 represented less than 40% of the value of investment in H2 2009, there has been a continued uptick in the number of investments made,” said William Miracky, a senior partner at Monitor Group, in the report. “Sovereign wealth funds’ confidence in global markets seems to be on the rise, and the increase in the number of investments in H1 2010 compared to a year earlier is an encouraging sign.”

The study analyzed SWF transactions in the first half of 2010, finding that 16 of the 33 SWFs in the Monitor/FEEM database undertook 92 publicly reported investments totaling $22.2 billion in that time period — double the number and value of the same period in 2009. Another major trend in SWF activity over the past year: attracting private capital. “This has raised the question that if a SWF is financed by something other than sovereign wealth, should we still think of it as a sovereign wealth fund?,” the report questioned, analyzing why money is being raised in this way, how it affects SWFs’ investment strategies, and whether it changes their sovereign nature.

The most popular sectors for attracting SWF activity: financial services with 19 transactions totaling $7.4 billion; natural resources, 16 purchases for $4.3 billion; and utilities, six deals totaling $4.3 billion. In financial services, according to the research, SWFs favored alternative assets over direct equity stakes in banks or recapitalizing their balance sheets. The study also revealed that SWFs have increased allocations to equities, commodities, real estate, and infrastructure during the first half of 2010, with fund officials pursuing private equity and hedge funds.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Furthermore, more than 75% of SWFs’ total deal value, or $16.3 billion, and about 47% of the deals occurred in developed nations. “A growing number of SWF investments occurred in countries such as India, Russia and … sub-Saharan Africa,” the study stated. “While the total value of these investments remains comparatively small — around $1.5 billion — it represents an ongoing trend of the geographic diversification of SWF portfolios.”

To see a magazine Interrogation with the Monitor Group and FEEM, click here.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Gubernatorial Candidate Bill White Says Texas Investments Politically Connected, TRS Denies

Bill White, the Democrat challenging Gov. Rick Perry, has accused the governor and his appointees of pressuring the staff of the Teacher Retirement System (TRS) to pick investment companies benefiting Perry contributors, yet an external investigative party has stated there are no improprieties with respect to how the investment decisions at TRS were made. 

(October 20, 2010) — Bill White, the Democrat challenging Perry in the November 2 election, has accused appointees of Gov. Rick Perry of pressuring the Texas Teacher Retirement System (TRS), which manages a trust fund valued at $102.4 billion, of making potentially risky investments that gave state business to politically connected companies.

In response to the allegations, TRS Executive Director Ronnie Jung hired an external party to investigate the concerns. “The investigation found no improprieties with respect to how the investment decisions in question were made,” the fund stated in a release. “The results of this investigation were also forwarded to the State Auditor’s Office. These actions were taken in accordance with TRS’ fiduciary responsibilities to our members and the Trust.”

The Washington Post reported that a 2009 government whistleblower memo, released by White’s campaign for governor and written by the retirement system’s former director of private market investments, claims that private investment firms whose executives made lofty contributions to Perry allegedly got special treatment at TRS, which experienced a recovery of 53% from a March 2009 value of $67 billion. The 2009 memo was written by the director of the system’s private markets team, Michael Green, to Linus Wright, then chairman of the board. It outlines instances in which Green asserts that Chief Investment Officer Britt Harris (profiled in aiCIO‘s upcoming issue) pressured staff members to set aside their objections to certain investments at the request of board members.

“Is it my imagination or does there seem to be a renewed urgency on Britt’s part to close a bundle of questionable transactions?” Green wrote in a February 2008 e-mail to a retirement system colleague that was included with the memo, the American-Statesman reported. The following day, Green continued: “The damage to our reputational equity and creation of a culture where board members feel empowered to finance their personal agendas with teacher/retiree/taxpayer $$$ don’t seem to concern him.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The leaked memo explains that staff was pressured to reverse a negative recommendation to invest with Encap Energy Capital, whose top managers are major Perry political donors. Additionally, the memo asserts that staff was urged to approve investments from outside managers who had an outside “placement agent” — a major Perry donor.

In addition, an online blog today raised questions about TRS investment decisions related to Cintinela Capital Partners and Parrish Capital Advisors. “Contrary to what this blog implied, TRS made no investments in either company,” TRS stated.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«