IMF Calms Fears on Greece, Warns Debt Crisis Could Spread to 'Core Euro Area'

While the International Monetary Fund has said Greece is well-positioned to avoid the restructuring of its debt, it warns that Europe's debt crisis could still spread to core euro zone countries and the emerging economies of eastern Europe.

(May 12, 2011) — According to a warning by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the sovereign debt crisis could still spread to the core euro zone countries and the emerging economies of eastern Europe.

“Contagion to the core euro area, and then onwards to emerging Europe, remains a tangible downside risk,” IMF said in its latest economic report — released Thursday — on Europe. The global lender noted that it would provide additional monetary aid to Greece if needed, yet indicated that the country is likely headed in the right direction. Calming fears over the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, Antonio Borges, director of the IMF’s European Department, said that the IMF does not currently anticipate the chance of sovereign default in Europe, yet also warned he doesn’t believe in “a miraculous restructuring solution.”

According to the IMF, substantial measures have already been put in place in the euro area to overcome the crisis. Nationally, new policies are being implemented to bolster confidence. Regionally, the governance framework is being revamped. “Important actions are still required to deal decisively with weak banks across Europe’s advanced economies, and to follow through with implementing the EU-wide reforms that have been agreed in principle,” the IMF noted.

Nevertheless, markets remain increasingly concerned that Greece will be unable to pay back its mound of €327 billion in debt, triggering massive investor losses. Greece may request an additional €60 billion ($85.21 billion) in aid and try to restructure its current debt package.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Furthermore, IMF’s Borges has urged the European Central Bank to have a cautious approach toward increases in interest rates after last month’s first increase since 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported, saying euro zone “monetary policy could afford to remain relatively accommodative.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

UK Pension Association Champions Single Regulatory Body

The UK's National Association of Pension Funds has concluded that a single body responsible for pensions is necessary to simplify the regulatory environment.

(May 11, 2011) — The National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) is calling for a single regulatory body for UK pension schemes.

According to the UK-based association, the Financial Services Authority’s responsibilities for group personal pensions and stakeholder pensions should transfer to The Pensions Regulator (TPR).

The result of the transfer would be a simplified regulatory environment, according to the NAPF. Furthermore, the NAPF asserted that the regulator should urge the establishment and development of super trusts to promote scale and good governance to workplace DC pensions.

While the UK’s NAPF is currently urging added authority on the part of TPR, the association has also criticized the industry watchdog, noting that TPR should be more accountable to those it regulates. In December, a survey by NAPF showed that a large majority of respondents believed the industry watchdog should be more accountable to trustees.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“We think the Regulator needs to engage more with those it regulates,” NAPF Chief Executive Joanne Segars said in a statement. “It should take a less prescriptive approach to regulation to ensure good quality occupational pension schemes thrive,” she said, adding that the findings send a strong message to the government about TPR’s accountability.

The NAPF’s December survey contrasted with an earlier report from January 2009 by the Better Regulation Executive and National Audit Office, which found the regulator’s stakeholders regard TPR as a “transparent and listening” organization. Yet, NAPF’s Segars stated — following the release of the NAPF’s study — that while she believed the regulator was successful in certain areas, the firm should take a broader, longer-term view.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«