Australian ETF Industry Should Devote Attention to Institutions, Russell Says

Russell Investments has asserted that the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry in Australia should focus its attention on institutional investors.

(June 2, 2011) — The Australian exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry should focus on institutional investors, says Russell Investments.

While retail use of ETFs has boomed in Australia, institutional use of the investment vehicles has not caught up to speed, contrasting with the way the ETF market has developed in Europe and the United States. Russell commissioned Deloitte Actuaries & Consultants to undertake interviews with 20 institutions that directly manage or advise more than 40% of Australian funds under management in a bid to discover their views on ETFs.

The study finds that 30% of institutions will consider using ETFs in the future in a significant way, with education and innovation being key to evolution of institutional ETF market. The report follows Russell’s launch of a new research report, “Digging Deeper: Institutional ETF investing in Australia,” which looks at how Australian institutions are using ETFs and plan to use them in the future.

Despite the growing popularity of ETFs, the local market is still in its infancy. “While some institutions initially perceived ETFs as a retail solution, the research found that the majority of institutions use ETFs in small way,” says Amanda Skelly, director ETFs at Russell Investments, in the report. “This is a positive sign for the industry although there is still a lot more we could do to help drive growth through product innovation and education.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Furthermore, Russell’s research notes that many larger institutions have also considered more innovative uses of ETFs in non-core parts of their business or for portfolios constructed for specific clients. “As institutions continue to evolve to address specific customer needs, be it managing pension assets differently, expanding the types of exposures they are seeking to access or taking a more macro approach to investing, ETFs can play a role. They should be considered alongside all other types of investment vehicles,” Skelly asserts. Meanwhile, for smaller institutions, Skelly notes that comfort with existing investment structures and processes and limited knowledge of ETFs have been the main barriers to acceptance.

Last week, a report by Greenwich Associates — based on interviews with 45 institutional funds, including corporate pensions, public pensions, and endowments and foundations, and 25 large asset management firms in the US collectively overseeing roughly $7.5 trillion — revealed that institutional investors are increasingly bullish on using ETFs in their portfolios. “Perhaps even more telling than those findings is the fact that not a single asset manager reported plans to cut ETF allocations in the coming two years, and less than one in 10 institutional funds plan to reduce allocations to ETFs in that period,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Andrew McCollum.

According to the firm, nearly one-half of the asset management firms and one-third of the institutional funds taking part in the Greenwich Associates study of current institutional ETF users plan to increase the share of portfolio assets that they invest in ETFs over the next two years.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Split Between US and UK Venture Capital Funds Decreases

A new report by the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) has found that the gap between US and UK venture capital funds has narrowed over the last decade.

(June 1, 2011) — A  new report has discovered that the performance gap in venture capital between the United States and the United Kingdom — once a significantly large divide — has gradually narrowed over the last decade.

The research by the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), titled ‘Atlantic Drift: Venture Capital Performance in the UK and the US’, found that the reason for the convergence was largely due to average returns in the US declining rather than a noticeable improvement in the performance of UK funds.

“The convergence of returns has not been driven by UK funds becoming better, but by the worsening performance of US funds,” the report stated.

According to the research, the gap in fund returns between the average US and UK fund has fallen from over 20% before the dot-com bubble (funds raised in 1990-1997) to 1% afterwards (funds raised in 1998-2005). Furthermore, average returns for funds raised after the bubble in both the UK and the US have been relatively poor, but venture capital performance is likely to move upwards as venture capital funds begin to cash out their investments in social networks (particularly in the US). Thus, according to the author of the report, Josh Lerner of Harvard Business School, US funds — better positioned to profit from the emerging social media boom with generally superior investment opportunities — may forge increasingly ahead of UK funds in performance.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

As outlined in NESTA’s research, the strongest quantifiable predictors of venture capital returns performance are (a) whether the fund managers’ prior funds outperform the market benchmark; (b) whether the fund invests in early rounds; (c) whether the fund managers have prior experience; and (d) whether the fund is optimally sized (neither too big nor too small). Moreover, historical performance has been higher for funds located in one of the four largest investor hubs (Silicon Valley, New York, Massachusetts and London) and for investments in information and communication technology.

In April, research from Dow Jones into private equity and venture capital fundraising also showed a divide between the US and UK. The research noted that while private equity and venture capital fundraising was up in the US, Europe experienced a slightly less optimistic fundraising environment.

“In 2010, many private equity firms focused on trying to return capital and those efforts are starting to bring their investors back to the party,” Laura Kreutzer, managing editor of Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst, said in a statement. “But limited partners are still like bouncers at an exclusive night club. They’re only letting the best looking groups behind the velvet rope. Everyone else still has to struggle for their attention.”

Dow Jones figures revealed that private equity funds in the US secured $31.6 billion for 89 funds during the first quarter, more than double the $13.5 billion raised for 81 funds during the same period last year. Meanwhile, the data showed that while European firms collected $8.2 billion during the quarter, up 39% from the $5.9 billion raised a year earlier, the number of closings declined to 22 from 32.

In the venture capital space, which has struggled to regain its peaks from the late 1990s and early 2000s, Dow Jones found that venture capital funds in the US raised $7.7 billion in the first quarter of 2011, nearly doubling the $3.9 billion raised in the same period last year and the highest first-quarter total since 2001. European venture firms, on the other hand, raised $653 million for five funds during the first quarter, down from $1.3 billion raised for 13 funds during the same period in 2010.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«

You have reached your limit of two free articles