Research: Perception That ESG Will Negatively Impact Returns Is False

Applying ESG factors to a portfolio does not negatively impact performance and may enhance it, new research reveals.

(August 1, 2011) — New research by RCM, a company of Allianz Global Investors, shows that introducing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into an investor’s selection process does not negatively impact performance, and instead, may actually enhance it.

“The perception that corporate efforts to become more sustainable reduce the value of companies and of investors’ portfolios is entrenched, but is based on largely unfounded assumptions and only thin academic evidence,” the research paper claims. “It is imperative to challenge this perception empirically because it is holding back the evolution of the nascent sustainability sector and of the wider corporate sector.”

The research — which tested the impact of ESG issues on portfolio performance over the period 2006 to 2010 — found investors could have added 1.6% per year over five years to their investment returns by allocating to portfolios that invest in companies with above-average ESG ratings.

While sustainability used to be perceived as a peripheral issue for many investors, it is increasingly becoming a component of the overall investment approach. The paper continues: “Modern investors are increasingly seeking to avoid blow-ups in their portfolios, eschew investments with questionable governance standards, and use material ESG data as a filter for capturing investment opportunities and managing related risks.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Additionally, RCM’s research shows that returns from portfolios of European companies represented the largestand most consistent spread between best-in-class and worst-in-class companies. According to the research, the disparity reflects greater integration of ESG factors in Europe than in the US.

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) initiative, backed by the United Nations, has added credibility to the embrace of sustainable investing. In September of last year, a group of institutional investors, with approximately $558 billion in assets under management, pushed global listing authorities and stock exchanges to demand that sustainability reporting become a part of their listing rules. According to a statement by Aviva Investors, this coalition of investors aimed to write to the CEOs of stock exchanges to make their demands, part of an engagement initiative launched by Aviva Investors and facilitated by the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) in 2009. The mission of the group is to encourage a global listing environment that requires companies to become more mindful of a sustainability strategy.

“We…believe that stock exchanges can play a crucial role in helping to create more sustainable global capital markets because of their ability to directly influence and monitor the operations and strategy of companies seeking to access the equity markets. We are sending a strong signal that, all things being equal, Aviva Investors would prefer to trade on stock exchanges that maintained this listing provision,” said Paul Abberley, CEO of Aviva Investors London, in a statement.

Separately, the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) has outlined a list of guidelines to help pensions understand climate-related risks and opportunities in their portfolios. A report released in June by the IIGCC revealed that twice as many investors are asking stock and bond managers about their global-warming policies compared to two years earlier. However, integration of these policies into investment mandates has been slow to take hold.

“The fact that asset owners now question their asset managers about their climate change policies prior to making a selection is a clear signal of increased awareness on climate change in the investment community,” said Ole Beier Sørensen, the new chairman of IIGCC. “This progress will be further strengthened if attention to climate change is applied throughout the decision‐making process, from investment manager selection to Investment Manager Agreements.”

The London-based Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change has around 58 members who manage about 5 trillion euros ($6 trillion).



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Adding to Bank of America’s Countrywide Legal Woes, Prominent Institutional Investors File Lawsuit

In another legal blow to Bank of America, a group of 15 institutional investors has sued the bank for allegedly misleading investors about the integrity of its subsidiary Countrywide Financial’s financial condition and lending practices.

(August 1, 2011) – In the latest development of an ongoing legal saga, a group of 15 prominent institutional investors has sued Bank of America (BofA) for its subsidiary Countrywide Financial’s alleged improprieties involved with the sale of mortgage-backed securities.

The group, including BlackRock, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), T Rowe Price Group, TIAA-CREF, and some in Europe, sued BofA in Los Angeles federal court, after deciding not to join a $624 million settlement that a court approved in February.

Accusing Countrywide Financial of perpetrating “massive and pervasive” fraud, the plaintiffs are suing BofA, which purchased the mortgage-lender on July 1, 2008, to recover their losses stemming from Countrywide’s sale of unsound mortgage-backed securities. According to the 425-page complaint, the 15 institutional investors alleged that Countrywide and its officials like former CEO Angelo Mozilo engaged in improper business practices and willfully misrepresented the integrity of the company’s lending practices and the quality of its mortgage-backed securities.

BofA pledged that it would fight the lawsuit. “It is unfortunate that select investors chose to opt out of a fair and equitable agreement to settle these issues,” Bill Halldin, a Bank of America spokesman, said to Reuters. “We intend to vigorously defend these claims.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The lawsuit comes on the heels of an announcement last month that BofA had agreed to a mammoth $14 billion settlement with investors who bought ill-fated subprime mortgage securities from Countrywide. About $8.5 billion of that settlement was earmarked for a group of larger investors led by Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and BlackRock. The settlement would have been the banking industry’s largest single settlement stemming from the 2008 housing market collapse, though it seems that some embittered investors, including BlackRock, were not happy with the size and details of the proposed deal.

The 15 institutional investors’ lawsuit is not the first legal challenge to BofA’s proposal to end litigation with Countrywide investors. On July 5, a group of 11 mortgage-bond investors calling themselves Walnut Place filed a challenge in New York County Supreme Court attacking the July deal’s fairness.

“Walnut Place has serious concerns about the secret, non-adversarial, and conflicted way in which the proposed settlement was negotiated and about the fairness of the terms of the proposed settlement,” said the group in the court filing.



<p>To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Benjamin Ruffel at <a href='mailto:bruffel@assetinternational.com'>bruffel@assetinternational.com</a></p>

«