PIMCO's El-Erian: Debt Deal Will Only Bring Temporary Relief

PIMCO's CEO Mohamed El-Erian says that if passed, the debt deal should lift markets, but a downgrade is still a threat.

(August 1, 2011) — While a potential debt ceiling deal in Washington may forestall a default and a credit downgrade, it won’t fix the root of the problem draining the US economy, according to Pacific Investment Management Co.’s (PIMCO) Mohammed El-Erian.

“The key issue…is that we simply cannot generate enough growth to get us over all these issues,” El-Erian, PIMCO’s co-CEO, said in an interview with CNBC. “Therefore, we have these structural headwinds that continue to slow us down. Until we see structural solutions we’re going to be stuck on the bumpy road to a new normal.”

El-Erian asserted that in the near-term, the deal could avert a debt downgrade threatened by ratings agencies, such as Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. Earlier this month, Moody’s cautioned that it would slash the US’ AAA credit rating if the government misses debt payments. It noted that because lawmakers have acted to increase the debt ceiling, it had not previously considered the situation high-risk.

Meanwhile, amid growing concerns about the US sovereign credit quality, Standard & Poor’s has placed 76 fixed-income funds on credit watch as a result of their exposure to US Treasury and government agency securities. It said in a statement “there is a one-in-two chance that we would lower the ratings (on the funds) over the next 90 days by up to two notches.” The statement added: “The action on the US government’s ‘AAA’ long-term and ‘A-1+’ short-term ratings reflects our view of two issues: the failure to raise the federal debt ceiling so as to ensure that the government will be able to continue to make scheduled payments on its obligations, and our view of the likelihood that Congress and the Obama Administration will agree upon a credible, medium-term fiscal consolidation plan in the foreseeable future.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Regarding overwhelming government debt burdens, the outspoken El-Erian wrote in an article posted on Reuters: “Other than some short bursts, Europe and America are unable to sustain the sort of economic recovery that would make a meaningful dent in their debt dynamics…If they are unable to grow out of their debt problems, countries…can default, and let restructuring lower our debt burdens, albeit in a rather disorderly fashion; or we can implement austerity, spending less in order to generate cash to pay off our debt.”

He said that America’s approach to escaping its debt problems — with the Federal Reserve maintaining low interest rates for a long period of time — will not suffice. “Look for America to intensify financial repression through regulations that forces banks and other regulated entities to hold low yielding government securities,” he cautioned. “Also, it will attempt to generate unanticipated inflation. Ultimately, it will be forced into more painful austerity involving both spending and tax measures.”

In response to US fiscal concerns, El-Erian, who popularized the phrase “new normal” to describe how growth will be depressed by consumer retrenchment and tighter financial regulation, has said the Fed’s purchase of Treasuries will lead to faster global inflation while failing to revive US economic growth. Thus, he has warned that investors should expect lower-than-average historical returns with greater regulation, lower consumption, slower growth, and a shrinking global role for the US economy.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Despite High Participation in Target-Date Funds, Uncertainty Looms Large

New research reveals that dissatisfaction and uncertainty surround target-date funds while participation in the funds is growing; industry experts have cited serious concern with the funds despite their strong rebound from losses during the financial crisis.

(August 1, 2011) – Although participation in target-date funds is increasing, satisfaction with the retirement-centric funds is unexpectedly low, research from Dimensional Fund Advisors’ DC Dimensions magazine revealed.

The funds, whose asset allocations become more conservative as retirement approaches, are common defined contribution vehicles for retirement accounts like 401(k) plans. According to Dimensional’s research, only 22% of participants say that they are “very satisfied” with their investment. 57% of participants reported being “somewhat satisfied,” while the remaining participants were dissatisfied with their investment.

The research was based on interviews with 1,000 participants in target-fund plans. Of the 78% of participants who were not “very satisfied” with their investment, 49% reported that their satisfaction was sub-optimal because of target-date funds’ poor returns relative to other investment options.

In spite of low satisfaction, participation in target-date funds is the highest since the crisis. Research from Ibbotson Associates shows that inflows into target-date funds during the first quarter of 2011 exceeded $16.5 billion, the highest total since before the crisis. The second quarter of 2011 saw $10.8 billion in inflows, marking a 10.7% increase from the same quarter last year. These increases in participation occurred in spite of modest returns during both quarters for the funds: in the first quarter, the average target-date fund had a 4% return, 1.9% lower than the S&P. In the second quarter, the average fund had a return of 0.6%.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Despite positive participation numbers, industry experts agree that there is reason for concern over target-date funds. aiCIO sister publication PlanSponsor recently published an article entitled “Target-Date/Risk-Based Fund Guide: Missing the Target.” The article explains that the lack of a clear benchmark for target-date funds makes classifying and comparing the funds very difficult. As a result, “It is very hard to pick the right fund, and to know afterward if you picked the right fund,” according to Pamela Hess, the director of retirement research at Hewitt Associates LLC. Other difficulties include the importance of risk/reward tradeoffs along with overall return as well as the fact that the funds are all relatively new.

In a press release from Folio Investing, Folio founder Steven Wallman said that he believes that target-date funds have still not distanced themselves sufficiently from the high exposure to stocks and bonds that led to the funds’ large losses during the crisis. “Most Target Date Funds apply an approach to asset allocation that can be enhanced…Our analysis shows that [target-date] funds are not as well diversified as they could be beyond stocks and bonds — which are correlated with those stocks — thereby leading to a high exposure to risk from a decline in stocks,” Wallman said.

Morningstar’s 2011 Target-Date Industry Survey reports that the “much-maligned” funds have almost fully recovered their losses from the crisis. In spite of this, Wallman says, the funds’ portfolios need to focus on what he calls “true diversification”: a broad range of asset classes and an investment strategy that aims for uncorrelated or negatively correlated assets.



<p>To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Justin Mundt at <a href='mailto:jmundt@assetinternational.com'>jmundt@assetinternational.com</a></p>

«