ADIA to Rejigger External Equities Teams

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) aims to streamline relationships with external fund managers to aid in pooling information within the organization, Reuters has reported.

(August 22, 2011) — Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund is seeking to restructure its equities teams.

According to Bloomberg, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), one of the world’s three largest sovereign wealth funds with assets valued at around $328 billion at the end of 2008, is reorganizing its external equities teams into two sections. One section will focus on indexed funds while the other will focus on those that are actively managed. Currently, ADIA allocates 60% of its total portfolio to externally managed indexed funds. Overall, approximately 80% of the fund’s assets are invested by external fund managers.

While Sheikh Mohammed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, son of the United Arab Emirates’ president, will lead the indexed funds department, Obeid Al-Suwaidi, previously director of external funds Far East, will lead actively managed external funds, according to Bloomberg.

“The creation of our new indexed-funds and active departments will streamline how we manage our relationships in the equities space with external fund managers. But it also forms part of our broader efforts to continually enhance the way we share and pool our knowledge and resources across the organisation,” an ADIA spokesman told Reuters.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Other sovereign wealth funds worldwide have been driven to make major changes to their teams and investments. A June study by Massachusetts-based Monitor Group shows that the financial crisis has spurred sovereign wealth funds to rely more on in-house assets and less on third-party expertise, for example.

In the Monitor Group report titled “Braving the New World: Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment in the Uncertain Times of 2010,” the advisory and consulting firm found that 2010 marked the beginning of a new pattern of sovereign wealth fund investment. According to Monitor, funds are making more direct investments in smaller sizes than witnessed previously. The firm stated: “During 2010, 21 of the 30 funds in the Monitor-FEEM Transaction Database executed 172 publicly reported investments, valued at a total of $52.7 billion. This represents an increase of more than 50% in deal volume from 2009 but a 23% decrease in investment value, continuing the trend of SWFs making a greater number of smaller investments. It is also the largest number of funds Monitor has witnessed making direct investments in any given year, up from 18 in 2009.”

“It is likely that we will continue to see SWFs taking a larger number of smaller stakes,” said Victoria Barbary, senior analyst at Monitor Group and co-editor of the report. “Contextualizing our data in the current economic environment suggests that commodities and other alternative assets will become an increasingly important asset class for SWFs. With SWFs keen to make good returns for their sovereign government owners, it may well be that they choose to increase their allocation to alternatives as they look to realign their portfolios with new economic results.”

In addition to the Monitor report, a February report by State Street Global Advisors (SSgA) similarly showed that the financial crisis spurred some funds to make several significant changes, such as relying more heavily on passive investment management strategies compared to active ones and increasing their focus on the emerging-market debt as yields on traditional asset classes have fallen. According to the study, one Middle East sovereign wealth fund commented on the significant shift during the past year of assets within sovereign portfolios from active to passive strategies, saying: “In the past we used to assume that assets should be managed actively unless a certain asset class or market clearly did not offer opportunities for active managers or reward active management. Now we tend to see this investment decision the other way round. We conclude that assets should by default be managed passively unless evidence is clear that a given asset class has sufficient imperfections that active management is likely to be consistently rewarded.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

UK's Coal Funds Create Investment Subsidiary to Improve Governance, Returns

Coal Pensions in the UK has founded a standalone investment subsidiary so that its trustees have an in-house source of market expertise.

(August 22, 2011) — In a mission to improve its governance and returns, Coal Pension Trustees has founded a standalone investment subsidiary, Financial News has reported.

Coal Pensions — which manages the £20 billion pension funds of the UK’s formerly nationalised coal industry — built the team in an effort for its trustees to have an in-house source for market expertise. The legal position of the in-house investment office will be clarified following approval by the Financial Services Authority in June.

According to the news service, internal experts can also challenge advice given by the schemes’ external consultants – Towers Watson and Mercer.

The drive to boost in-house expertise in not unique to the UK. In recent years, the pursuit of added in-house capabilities has been especially prevalent among Canadian funds. Late last year, for example, the Caisse de Depot et Placement du Quebec, Canada’s second biggest pension-fund manager, reported plans to boost staff at its private equity unit by around 25% in 2011 as it pursues its mission to contribute to the economic development of Quebec.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Similarly, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), which won aiCIO’s Industry Innovation Award last year for public pension funds with over $15 billion in assets, boosted its in-house asset management unit to better compete for talent. “We are honored to receive this recognition,” Neil Petroff, Executive Vice-President, Investments and Chief Investment Officer at Teachers’, said in response to its win at aiCIO‘s awards event in early December. “We have a highly skilled investment team at Teachers’ who have helped build a reputation for innovative, in-house asset management that has long distinguished our investment program.”

“We were the first with a private equity direct investment team, and were among the first to invest directly in infrastructure,” OTPP spokesperson Deborah Allan told aiCIO, noting the Canadian fund’s position as a pension fund leader in direct investments. Further evidence of OTPP’s role as a leader in boosting its internal private equity team comes from the October 18 appointment of Jane Rowe, who assumed her position as senior vice-president of Teachers’ Private Capital, the private investment department of Teachers’.

In the US, the State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) reported last September that it was looking to transfer $3.9 billion of externally managed international equity assets in-house, reflecting the financial pressure on pensions to increase the in-house management of assets and boost efficiency. “We’ve always had in-house management and we’ve increased it from 20% in 2007 to over 41% as of the end of last year,” Vicki Hearing, public information officer at the State of Wisconsin Investment Board, told aiCIO.  



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«