Survey: Institutional Investors Gain by Negotiating on Fees

By haggling with the fund companies they invest with, institutional investors can negotiate hefty percentage discounts on fund management fees, a study by bfinance shows.

(June 7, 2011) — Research by consultant firm bfinance has shown that hard bargaining has given institutional investors the power to negotiate double-digit percentage discounts on fund management fees.

The firm said savings of more than 26% were possible among institutional investors hiring managers, on average, based on the rates that managers were first quoted. According to the research, a typical institutional investor in the United Kingdom allocating £1 billion could also cut fees by about 5% by limiting the number of mandates it has.

The study is a reflection of the heightened pressure on managers since the financial crisis to pay closer attention to their fees in terms of level and structure. As investors suffered huge losses during the financial crisis, management and performance fees and alignment of interest between investors and fund managers have become a greater concern.

The average management fee levels quoted, before negotiation, in bfinance-aided searches over the past 12 months were the following: For actively managed equities across market caps, the fixed fees quoted went down from Latin America at 0.92%; to emerging markets (0.89%); Asia ex Japan (0.7%); global (0.6%); Eurozone/Europe (0.54%); and EAFE and US (each 0.52%). Furthermore, for active small and mid-cap equity funds, the management charges first quoted ranged from 0.85% for Europe/Eurozone to 0.68% for Japan.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“The same investor who chooses to use several active fund managers for diversification purposes could achieve far greater cost reductions by placing investment managers in an open and transparent selection process that encourages negotiation,” bfinance said.

Olivier Cassin, managing director, head of research and development at bfinance, added: “Performance-related fee structures are by their nature interesting, as they align the interests of investors and managers, but investors, with the help of their consultants, must systematically seek to rebalance the structure offered by the fund manager in their favor.”

The study encompassed 50 mandates relating to typical investments in international institutional portfolios with findings based on almost 1,200 price quotes from 350 fund management companies.

A previous analysis over fees has claimed a lack of alignment over active management fees. A report out of London, released in February by consultant Lane Clark & Peacock (LCP), asserted that active fund managers are receiving more credit than deserved as markets rebound. Last year, UK fund managers charged their pension clients an additional $485.1 million, or an increase of 11%, in fees for returns that were largely fueled by strong markets as opposed to superior skills, according to the report.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

PIMCo Took Large Lehman Loss, Gross Shrugs

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Pacific Investment Management Co. lost $3.4 billion on its investment in Lehman Brothers but PIMCo head Bill Gross is unconcerned.

Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCo) lost $3.4 billion on its investment in Lehman Brothers before its September 2008 collapse, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

The figure emerged from liquidation plans and investment disclosures filed in a federal bankruptcy court in New York.

PIMCo, the largest mutual fund in the world, bought billions of Lehman’s bonds over the course of about eight years, paying at or near their face value. At the time of Lehman’s bankruptcy, the firm held more than $4.5 billion of senior Lehman bonds.

After the bankruptcy, PIMCo sharply marked down the bonds on its books. Currently the firm holds the bonds at roughly 25 cents on the dollar.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Bill Gross, the legendary bond-investor and head of PIMCo, was dismissive of the WSJ’s report. On May 27, Gross pre-empted the WSJ story on Twitter by acknowledging PIMCo’s ill-fated investments in Lehman. Calling the story “old news,” Gross went on to mock the paper by accusing it of “Andrew Ross Sorkin envy.”

PIMCo manages $1.3 trillion in assets and, despite the Lehman losses, PIMCo’s 2008 investment returns were among the industry’s best.

“These holdings have long ago been marked to market,” a PIMCo spokesman told the WSJ.

Still, the losses represent a rare black eye for the fund and its vaunted chief. In July 2008 Gross claimed there was “close to 100% probability” that Lehman would avoid failure.

PIMCo is still locked in a bankruptcy battle with other creditors over the remains of the investment bank. Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and other financial institutions that are owed money by Lehman’s derivative unit are seeking to recover their losses at the expense of the rest of Lehman’s estate. PIMCo, allied with the hedge fund Paulson & Co and CalPERS, are hoping to take over Lehman’s bankruptcy plan and boost pay-outs to bondholders by billions of dollars.



<p>To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Benjamin Ruffel at <a href='mailto:bruffel@assetinternational.com'>bruffel@assetinternational.com</p>

«