Preqin Finds First-Time PE Fund Managers Should Be Optimistic

According to Preqin's latest research, private equity fund managers seeking to raise their first funds have reason to be hopeful.

(September 16, 2011) — Preqin’s latest research has found that private equity fund managers looking to raise their first funds have reason to be optimistic.

According to the research, more than 50% of investors have stated that they will at least consider investing in a first-time or spin-off fund, while performance data suggests that these funds have generated good returns for investors in the past.

“The private equity fundraising environment is extremely competitive, but there is evidence that despite the difficulties, emerging managers are successfully raising funds,” Preqin’s Helen Kenyon stated in a release. “While investors place a lot of importance on a fund manager’s past performance, they are keen to take advantage of highly attractive opportunities. With 36% of first-time fund managers going on to manage top quartile funds, it is perhaps not surprising that more than half of investors in private equity funds will consider backing a first-time or spin-off fund.”

In addition, the study showed that despite tough fundraising conditions, since the start of 2011, a number of first-time funds have reached a final close within a year of setting out. The conclusion, according to the research firm, is that investors are eager to take advantage of attractive opportunities regardless of manager experience. The research noted that the average time spent fundraising for first-time funds closed in 2011 to date is 20.2 months.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

A report earlier this month by SEI and Greenwich Associates shows private equity is in demand as institutional investors, fund managers, and consultants plan to increase their allocations of the asset class or recommend increases to their clients over the next year, but they are urging greater transparency in the asset class.

The survey from SEI and Greenwich Associates, titled “The Logic of Fund Flows,” found that 26% of investors plan to increase their private equity mandates in the next year. However, investors and consultants differed on their investment objectives regarding private equity. Approximately two-thirds of investors (68%) pointed to return potential as their primary objective as opposed to 10% of consultants. Fifty percent of consultants, meanwhile, said diversification was their primary investment objective as opposed to only 18% of investors.

“As investors are looking to achieve higher returns in an increasingly challenging return environment, private equity is coming back, but standards are higher across the board,” said Greenwich Associates Managing Director Rodger Smith.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Massachusetts Senate Approves New Pension Rules, Changing Benefits Calculation

The Massachusetts Senate has passed a major overhaul of the state pension system to cut benefits for future workers, with the goal of saving $5 billion over a 30-year plan.

(September 16, 2011) — The Massachusetts Senate has approved an overhaul of the state’s pension system.

The bill aims to save the state $5 billion over the next three decades while lowering the state’s $17 billion unfunded pension liability  

The Massachusetts proposal would increase the minimum retirement age for most public employees from 55 to 60. Additionally, it would increase the retirement age for maximum benefits from 65 to 67 while also changing the way benefits are calculated. Under the proposals, benefits would be analyzed based on a worker’s top five years of earnings as opposed to the current practice of basing it on the top three years.

The changes would apply to state employees hired after Jan. 1, 2012.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Following the approved reforms, Senate President Therese Murray (D-Plymouth) stated: “We made a commitment, after eliminating many the worst offenses two years ago, to come back and address the more complicated issues in our pension system. This bill makes changes that are necessary for reducing our unfunded pension and retiree health liabilities and contains realistic modifications for modernizing our system. A modern pension system is essential to maintaining and improving the Commonwealth’s already strong bond rating.”

Despite the reforms, a fiscal watchdog group has warned that the proposal could place the state pension system’s bond rating in jeopardy. “The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation strongly urges you to reject any amendments to the proposed pension reform legislation that would lessen the savings included in the bill. In its current form, the proposal achieves approximately $5 billion in savings, the minimum goal set forth by the ratings agencies,” wrote Michael Widmer, president of the nonpartisan, business-backed organization in a letter sent to the state Senate.

Unions, including the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, the Massachusetts Teachers Association and the Retired State, County and Municipal Employees Association, have also criticized the proposal.

“The unfunded liability is a serious problem, but it was incurred decades ago when pensions were funded on a pay-as-you-go-basis and insufficient funds were set aside. The problem was not caused by future employees, and they should not be required to receive smaller pensions because of it,” a letter written by the Public Employees Coalition on Public Employee Pensions to members of the state Senate stated.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«