No. 1 Worry for European Investors: Interest-Rate Risk

A new study shows European investors rank interest-rate risk as a top threat to their investments, followed by a stock market fall and Europe's sovereign debt crisis.

(June 16, 2011) — European institutional investors view interest rate risk as a top concern, a new study by Allianz Global Investors shows.

Among pension funds and other institutional investors in Europe, government credit risk ranks as the second-biggest threat to investments. Of the 156 respondents surveyed, about 47% of respondents cite government credit risk as a considerable risk and about 15% as a huge risk.

Perception of risk varies by location, the study shows. Investors in Austria, France and Italy are most concerned about sovereign debt risk largely as a result of bailout packages granted to Greece, Ireland and Portugal. Meanwhile, British and Scandanavian investors view declines in market prices as well as interest rates as the main risks.

In the next 12 months, hedging interest rate exposure, monitoring risk and further diversification are the three most popular options to deal with risk, the study shows.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The perceived threat of inflation among European investors echos findings from a Mercer survey last month that showed European pension funds are buying inflation-protected instruments to guard their portfolios from increasing inflation. The investment consultancy’s annual European Asset Allocation Survey of more than 1,000 European pension funds with assets of over $812 billion found that compared to last year, an overwhelming 80% of respondents are now more concerned about the threat of rising inflation.

“Protection, through acquiring inflation hedging assets (such as inflation bonds and swaps), looks to be expensive and there is a risk that such investments provide ‘insurance’ for events that never actually happen,” Tom Geraghty, Mercer’s head of investment consulting for Europe, Middle East and Africa, commented in a statement. “Pension funds also need to understand the extent to which their liabilities are affected by higher inflation. In some cases, inflation caps may mean that higher inflation is less negative for pension schemes than might be expected,” he said, noting that it is imperative that schemes understand how their liabilities are impacted by various inflation scenarios.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

US Private Equity Hangover Persists, Cambridge Associates Says

A report by consultancy Cambridge Associates has found that private equity funds in the United States have $376 billion in leftover capital, called "overhang."

(June 16, 2011) — Research by Cambridge Associates shows that US private equity funds had a combined $376 billion in assets, net of fees, left to invest as of December 31.

US private equity funds raised $915 billion from 2005 to 2010, of which about half had been called as of December 31, 2010, leaving a $376 billion overhang net of fees, according to Cambridge Associates calculations. While overhang is smaller than it was last year, this may well change in 2011, as several mega funds are either fund raising or actively considering it, the report notes.

“The current overhang remains too large to be absorbed by anything but a replay of the easy credit–powered 2005–08 exit environment,” the report concludes, adding that the problem largely remains in funds of more than $1 billion.

Cambridge Associates’ research states: “A little over a year ago, we posited that the capital overhang in the U.S. private equity industry, while significant, was mainly confined to larger funds, and that smaller funds seemed better positioned due to both a less significant overhang and a better transaction pace. This remains broadly true today, although there are some additional wrinkles to the story—e.g., many funds have looming deadlines to get cash invested, some mega funds are coming back to market, the exit environment has recovered (at least for the moment), and the overhang for mega funds has shrunk a bit. Still, we continue to believe smaller funds (broadly speaking, less than $1 billion) are more attractive, in aggregate, than larger funds.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The report, entitled “Still Nursing The U.S. Private Equity Overhang Hangover,” finds that the reason for the decrease in leftover capital is that funds with more than $5 billion made investments in 2010 yet raised little to no money. Furthermore, the consultant firm noted that a total of 42% of the current overhang is in funds of more than $5 billion in size with an additional 43% in funds ranging from $1 billion to $5 billion.

Looking ahead, Cambridge Associates reveals optimistic news in the private equity space, noting recent improvements in exit markets. Because of the overhang, according to the report, investors who did not make any new private equity commitments in 2008 and 2009 are still gaining exposure to current investment opportunities.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«